首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Operations and Production Management >Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
【24h】

Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities

机译:公共部门的企业治理问题:董事会的视角和特殊性

获取原文
           

摘要

Goal: the objective of the paper is to extend the discussions on corporate governance to the public sector and examine good governance from a Ghanaian institutional context. Design / Methodology / Approach: literature is based on relevant theoretical concepts and seven explanatory variables of corporate governance. Primary data was abstained through structured questionnaires administered to public servants from the Ministries, Departments and Agencies- MDA's in Accra. Ordinary Least Square multiple regression was employed to analyze a total valid sample of 568. The findings represent the opinions of board of directors, internal auditors, senior management and employees. Results: the empirical result shows that audit committees, leadership, board effectiveness, accountability and directors' qualification are strong determinants of good governance in public organizations. However, board size has no impact on good governance when board independence is negative. There is evidence that international corporate governance principles are reasonably visible without any significant deviations. Limitations of the investigation: The study is empirically limited with the absence of key variables such as corruption, ethnicity and tribal politics in public organizations in Ghana. These are major factors associated with institutional governance in developing countries. Practical Implications: the study observed a negative relationship between board independence and good governance attributed to lack of board diversity. The study implies that gender balanced boards composed of higher ratio of female directors could enhance decision-making and guarantee board effectiveness. Originality / Value: the study emphasizes that public and private organizations share almost similar governance indicators, considering the model estimation. There is evidence that corporate governance is gaining popularity in the public sector, a discussion that is often limited to the private sector. The study contributes to the limited existing findings on the subject from a Ghanaian institutional context. Finally, the results validate many empirical opinions about the negative relationship between good governance and board size from different institutional environments.
机译:目标:本文的目标是向公共部门的公司治理讨论,并从加纳机构背景下审查良好的治理。设计/方法/方法:文学基于相关的理论概念和公司治理的七种解释性变量。主要数据通过管理在Accra的部门,部门和机构的公共仆人向公务员提供的结构化问卷弃权。采用普通的最小二乘来分析568的总有效样本。该研究结果代表了董事会,内部审计师,高级管理层和雇员的意见。结果:经验结果表明,审计委员会,领导力,董事会有效性,问责制和董事资格是公共组织治理的强大决定因素。但是,当董事会独立性为负时,董事会规模对良好治理没有影响。有证据表明,没有任何重大偏差,国际公司治理原则合理可见。调查的局限性:该研究凭经对加纳的公共组织中的腐败,种族和部落政治等关键变量的缺失。这些是与发展中国家的机构治理相关的主要因素。实际意义:该研究观察了董事会独立与良好治理之间的负面关系,归因于缺乏董事会多样性。该研究意味着由女性董事的更高比例组成的性别平衡板可以提高决策和担保委员会的效果。原创性/价值:该研究强调,考虑模型估计,公共和私人组织分享了几乎类似的治理指标。有证据表明,公司治理在公共部门越来越受欢迎,该讨论通常限于私营部门。该研究有助于来自加纳机构背景的受试者的有限发现。最后,结果验证了对不同机构环境的良好治理与董事会规模之间的负面关系的许多经验性意见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号