首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma >Real-Time Visual Feedback Device Improves Quality Of Chest Compressions; A Manikin Study
【24h】

Real-Time Visual Feedback Device Improves Quality Of Chest Compressions; A Manikin Study

机译:实时视觉反馈设备可提高胸部按压的质量;人体模型研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a real-time visual feedback device on CCs rate and depth delivered by?healthcare professionals.Methods: In a simulated scenario a sensor was placed on a manikin’s chest and connected to a defibrillator?which provided real-time visual feedback on the rate and depth of CCs. Thirty-two healthcare professionals?performed sequentially 5 cycles of 30 CCs without (FeedOFF) and with (FeedON) feedback. CCs with a depth?between 50 and 60mm and a rate between 100 and 120cpm were considered optimal.Results: Visual feedback resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of CCs with optimal depth (median?8.7 [interquartile range 0.7–55.5]% FeedOFF vs 63.3 [17.6–88.1]% FeedON, p=0.002) and optimal rate (median?51.3 [1.3–81.3]% FeedOFF vs 68.3 [45.3–86.1]% FeedON, p=0.018). Overall, CCs were too shallow and too?fast in the FeedOFF cycle. There was also a significant increase in optimal CCs (optimal depth and rate) with?the use of the feedback device (from median 0.7 [0–26.9]% FeedOFF to 31.9 [3.6-59.9]% FeedON, p=0.001).?Participants’ factors such as age, sex, body mass index, job or time since last CPR training did not have a?significant impact on CPR quality.Conclusion: In the absence of visual feedback, there is a tendency towards lower depth and higher rate of CCs.?The use of feedback technology significantly improves the quality of CCs.
机译:目的:评估实时视觉反馈装置对CCS率和深度的影响吗?医疗保健专业人员。方法:在模拟场景中,将传感器放在Manikin的胸部并连接到除颤器?这提供了实时提供的关于CCS速率和深度的视觉反馈。三十二个医疗保健专业人士?在没有(FeedOff)和(FeedOn)反馈的情况下顺序排列的30个CCS的循环。深度的CCS在50到60毫米之间和100到120毫米之间的速率被认为是最佳的。结果:视觉反馈导致CCS比例大幅增加,具有最佳深度(中位数?8.7 [四分位数0.7-55.5]%eductoff VS 63.3 [17.6-88.1]%Feedon,P = 0.002)和最佳速率(中位数?51.3 [1.3-81.3]%Feedoff Vs 68.3 [45.3-86.1]%Feedon,P = 0.018)。总的来说,CCS太浅了,而不是在提前循环中快速。最佳CCS(最佳深度和速率)也有显着增加?使用反馈装置(来自中位数0.7 [0-26.9]%前馈时间至31.9 [3.6-59.9]%Feeder,P = 0.001)。?年龄,性别,体重指数,工作或时间之类的参与者的因素没有对CPR质量产生重大影响。结论:在没有视觉反馈的情况下,存在较低的深度和更高速度的趋势CCS。使用反馈技术的使用显着提高了CCS的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号