首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Do male engagement and couples’ communication influence maternal health care-seeking? Findings from a household survey in Mozambique
【24h】

Do male engagement and couples’ communication influence maternal health care-seeking? Findings from a household survey in Mozambique

机译:男性参与和情侣的沟通影响孕产妇保健追求吗?莫桑比克家庭调查的调查结果

获取原文
           

摘要

This study explored effects of couples’ communication and male participation in birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) on delivery in a health facility (“institutional delivery”). A cross-sectional, baseline household survey was conducted in November 2016 prior to an integrated maternal and child health project in Nampula and Sofala Provinces in Mozambique. The study used the Knowledge, Practices and Coverage survey tool, a condensed version of the Demographic and Health Survey and other tools. The sample included 1422 women. Multivariable logit regression models tested the association of institutional delivery with couples’ communication and four elements of BPCR both with and without male partners: 1) saving money, 2) arranging transport, 3) choosing a birth companion, and 4) choosing a delivery site; controlling for partners’ attendance in antenatal care and social and demographic determinants (education, wealth, urban/rural location, and province). The odds that women would deliver in a health facility were 46% greater (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)?=?1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI)?=?1.02–2.10, p?=?0.04) amongst women who discussed family planning with their partners than those who did not. Approximately half of this effect was mediated through BPCR. When a woman arranged transport on her own, there was no significant increase in institutional delivery, but with partner involvement, there was a larger, significant association (aOR?=?4.31, 2.64–7.02). Similarly, when a woman chose a delivery site on her own, there was no significant association with institutional delivery (aOR 1.52,0.81–2.83), but with her partner, there was a larger and significant association (aOR 1.98, 1.16–3.36). Neither saving money nor choosing a birth companion showed a significant association with institutional delivery—with or without partner involvement. The odds of delivering in a facility were 28% less amongst poor women whose partners did not participate in BPCR than wealthy women, but when partners helped choose a place of delivery and arrange transport, this gap was nearly eliminated. Our findings add to growing global evidence that men play an important role in improving maternal and newborn health, particularly through BPCR, and that couples’ communication is a key approach for promoting high-impact health behaviors.
机译:本研究探讨了夫妻沟通和男性参与在卫生机构(“机构交付”)交付中的出生准备和并发症准备(BPCR)的影响。在2016年11月在墨西哥南巴尼克州南美州和索菲拉省省份的综合妇幼保健项目之前进行了横断面的基准家庭调查。该研究使用了知识,实践和覆盖范围调查工具,凝聚的人口和健康调查和其他工具。样品包括1422名女性。多变量的Logit回归模型测试了机构交付协会与情侣的通信和BPCR的四个元素,无论是男性合作伙伴:1)节省资金,2)安排运输,3)选择出生伴侣,4)选择送货网站;控制伴侣在产前护理和社会和人口决定因素的出席(教育,财富,城乡和省)。妇女将在卫生机构中提供的赔率更大(调整赔率比(AOR)?=?1.46,95%置信区间(CI)?=?1.02-2.10,p?= 0.04)讨论的女性与他们的合作伙伴的计划生育而不是那些没有的人。大约一半的这种效果通过BPCR介导。当一个女人自己安排运输时,机构交付没有显着增加,但与合作伙伴参与,有一个更大,重要的关联(AOR?=?4.31,2.64-7.02)。同样,当一个女人自己选择一个交付网站时,与机构交付没有显着的关联(AOR 1.52,0.81-2.83),但与她的伴侣一起,有一个更大而重要的协会(AOR 1.98,1.16-3.36) 。暂不省钱,也没有选择出生同伴展示了与机构交付的重大关联 - 有或没有合作伙伴参与。在贫困妇女中,在贫困妇女中,在合作伙伴没有参加BPCR的贫困妇女中,较贫穷的妇女比富裕的妇女的交付的可能性少了28%,但当合作伙伴帮助选择一个交货和安排运输时,这一差距几乎消除了。我们的调查结果增加了不断增长的全球证据,即人们在改善孕产妇和新生儿的健康方面发挥重要作用,特别是通过BPCR,并且夫妻的沟通是促进高影响力的健康行为的关键方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号