首页> 外文期刊>BMC Neurology >The effect of stimulation therapy and donepezil on cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease. A community based RCT with a two-by-two factorial design
【24h】

The effect of stimulation therapy and donepezil on cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease. A community based RCT with a two-by-two factorial design

机译:刺激治疗与多奈哌齐对阿尔茨米尔病中的认知功能的影响。基于社区的RCT,具有双重派分设计

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Progressive neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) induces cognitive deterioration, and there is controversy regarding the optimal treatment strategy in early AD. Stimulation therapy, including physical exercise and cholinesterase inhibitors are both reported to postpone cognitive deterioration in separate studies. We aimed to study the effect of stimulation therapy and the additional effect of donepezil on cognitive function in early AD. Method Design: A two-by-two factorial trial comprising stimulation therapy for one year compared to standard care to which a randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trial with donepezil was added. Setting: Nine rural municipalities in Northern Norway. Participants: 187 participants 65?years and older with a recent diagnosis of mild or moderate AD were included in the study of which 146 completed a one-year follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: In five municipalities the participants received stimulation therapy whereas participants in four received standard care. All participants were randomised double-blindly to donepezil or placebo and tested with three different cognitive tests four times during the one-year study period. Main outcome: Changes in MMSE sum score. Secondary outcome: Changes in ADAS-Cog and Clock Drawing Test. Results MMSE scores remained unchanged amongst AD participants receiving stimulation therapy and those receiving standard care. The results were consistent for ADAS-Cog and Clock Drawing Test. No time trend differences were found during one-year follow-up between groups receiving stimulation therapy versus standard care or between donepezil versus placebo. Conclusion In rural AD patients non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapy did not improve outcome compared with standard care but all groups retained cognitive function during one year follow-up. Other studies are needed to confirm these results. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT00443014). EudraCT database (no 2004-002613-37).
机译:背景技术阿尔茨海默病(AD)在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中诱导认知恶化,并且在早期广告中的最佳治疗策略存在争议。刺激治疗,包括体育锻炼和胆碱酯酶抑制剂都据报道,在单独的研究中推迟认知劣化。我们旨在研究刺激治疗的影响及多奈哌齐对早期广告中的认知功能的额外效果。方法设计:与标准护理相比,将刺激治疗的两倍局线试验组一年,随后进行随机的双盲安慰剂对照试验。环境:挪威北部九本市城市。参与者:187名参与者65?迄今为止迄今为止迄今为止的轻度或中度广告的诊断较少,其中包含146人完成一年的随访。干预措施:在五个市内,参与者接受了刺激疗法,而四个接受的标准护理参与者。所有参与者将所有参与者随机盲目地对Deppezil或安慰剂进行了双盲,并在一年的研究期间用三次不同的认知测试测试。主要结果:MMSE总和分数的变化。次要结果:ADAS-COG和时钟绘图测试的变化。结果MMSE分数在接受刺激治疗和接受标准护理的参与者中保持不变。结果是ADAS-COG和时钟绘图测试一致。在接受刺激治疗与标准护理或Dentpezil与安慰剂之间的一年之间的一年后,未发现趋势差异。结论在农村广告患者中,非药理学和药理治疗没有改善结果与标准护理相比,但所有群体在一年后保留了认知功能。需要其他研究来确认这些结果。试验登记ClinicalTrials.gov(标识符:NCT00443014)。 eudract数据库(没有2004-002613-37)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号