...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparison between different initial dialysis modalities in end-stage renal disease patients due to lupus nephritis prior to renal transplantation
【24h】

Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparison between different initial dialysis modalities in end-stage renal disease patients due to lupus nephritis prior to renal transplantation

机译:系统审查和临床结果的临床结果与肾移植术前腹期肾病患者的不同初期透析方式的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Regarding lupus disease activity, morbidity and survival, limited literature concluded conflicting results when comparing hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis as initial renal replacement therapies (RRT) prior to transplantation, in lupus nephritis end-stage renal disease (LN-ESRD) patients. This study was aimed to compare the risks of lupus flares, all-cause infections, all-cause cardiovascular events, and mortality, between hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis as initial RRT - modality before renal-transplant in LN-ESRD patients, by systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS:PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched for observational-studies comparing LN-ESRD -patients undergoing hemodialysis (Group1) versus peritoneal-dialysis (Group 2) prior to renal-transplantation, by their risks of lupus flare, all-cause infections, all-cause cardiovascular events, and mortality as outcome measures. Relative-Risks of outcomes between the groups measured overall effects at a 95% significance level. RevMan 5.3 computer software was used for analysis.RESULTS:From search, 16 eligible studies reported 15,636 LN-ESRD -patients prior to renal transplantation with 4616 patients on hemodialysis, 2089 on peritoneal dialysis, 280 directly underwent kidney transplantation, 8319 were eliminated with reasons and 332 participants' details were not reported. Hemodialysis group had higher risk of all-cause cardiovascular events, Relative-Risk?=?1.44 (Confidence Interval:1.02, 2.04), p-Value?0.05. With regards to risks for mortality, flare and all-cause infections, there were trends that were not statistically significant (p-Value?0.05).CONCLUSION:Except for all-cause cardiovascular events in which peritoneal dialysis is superior to hemodialysis offering better outcomes, both treatment modalities offer more or less similar clinical outcomes as effective initial choices of RRT in LN-ESRD patients prior to renal transplant.THE PROTOCOL REGISTRATION:PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019131600.
机译:背景技术:关于狼疮疾病活动,发病率和生存,有限的文献在将血液透析与腹膜透析相比,在移植前将血液透析与腹膜置换疗法(RRT)进行比较时,在狼疮性肾炎末期肾病(LN-ESRD)患者中,有限的文献结束了相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在比较狼疮耀斑,全因感染,全因心血管事件和死亡率的风险,血液透析与腹膜透析在LN-ESRD患者中肾移植前的初始RRT - 模态之间,通过系统审查和Meta-Analysis.methods:搜索了Pubmed,Embase和Scopus的观察研究比较血液透析(Group1)与腹膜透析(第2组)进行的LN-Esrd-idanys(第2组),通过其狼疮耀斑的风险,全因感染,全导致心血管事件和死亡率为结果措施。群体之间的相对风险测量了95%的显着性水平的总体效果。 Revman 5.3计算机软件用于分析。结果:从搜索,16项合格的研究报告,在肾移植之前报告了15,636名LN-ESRD - 血液透析患者,2089例腹膜透析,280次直接接受肾移植,原因消除了8319例并没有报告332名参与者的细节。血液透析组的风险较高,相对风险?=?1.44(置信区间:1.02,2.04),P值<0.05。关于死亡率的风险,火炬和全均导致感染,存在趋势在统计学上没有统计学意义(p值> 0.05)。结论:除了腹膜透析优于血液透析的全导致心血管事件外结果,两种治疗方式在肾移植前的LN-ESRD患者中的RRT初始选择或多或少类似的临床结果。议定书注册:Prospero 2019年CRD42019131600。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号