首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >CO2 and O2 removal during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration: a pilot study
【24h】

CO2 and O2 removal during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration: a pilot study

机译:在连续静脉静脉血液过滤期间CO 2和O 2去除:试验研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Carbon dioxide (CO2) accumulation is a challenging issue in critically ill patients. CO2 can be eliminated by renal replacement therapy but studies are scarce and clinical relevance is unknown. We prospectively studied CO2 and O2 behavior at different sample points of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and build a model to calculate CO2 removal bedside. In 10 patients receiving standard CVVH under citrate anticoagulation, blood gas analysis was performed at different sample points within the CVVH circuit. Citrate was then replaced by NaCl 0.9% and sampling was repeated. Total CO2 (tCO2), CO2 flow (V?CO2) and O2 flow (V?O2) were compared between different sample points. The effect of citrate on transmembrane tCO2 was evaluated. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was performed to evaluate significance of difference between 2 data sets. Friedman test was used when more data sets were compared. V?CO2 in the effluent (26.0?ml/min) correlated significantly with transmembrane V?CO2 (24.2?ml/min). This represents 14% of the average expired V?CO2 in ventilated patients. Only 1.3?ml/min CO2 was removed in the de-aeration chamber, suggesting that CO2 was almost entirely cleared across the membrane filter. tCO2 values in effluent, before, and after the filter were not statistically different. Transmembrane tCO2 under citrate or NaCl 0.9% predilution also did not differ significantly. No changes in V?O2 were observed throughout the CVVH circuit. Based on recorded data, formulas were constructed that allow bedside evaluation of CVVH-attributable CO2 removal. A relevant amount of CO2 is removed by CVVH and can be quantified by one simple blood gas analysis within the circuit. Future studies should assess the clinical impact of this observation. The trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov with trial registration number NCT03314363 on October 192,017.
机译:二氧化碳(CO2)积累是危重患者的挑战性问题。 CO2可以通过肾置换疗法消除,但研究稀缺,临床相关性未知。我们在连续静脉静脉血液过滤(CVVH)的不同样本点处潜在研究CO2和O2行为,并建立模型以计算CO2去除床头柜。在10名接受柠檬酸盐抗凝下接受标准CVVH的患者中,在CVVH电路的不同样品点处进行血气分析。然后通过NaCl 0.9%替代柠檬酸盐并重复取样。在不同的样品点之间比较了总共CO 2(TCO2),CO 2流量(V≤CO2)和O2流动(VΔO2)。评价柠檬酸盐对跨膜TCO2的影响。 Wilcoxon匹配对签名等级测试是为了评估2个数据集之间的差异的重要性。在比较更多数据集时使用弗里德曼测试。 v?在流出物(26.0×ml / min)中的CO 2与跨膜V≤CO2(24.2μl/ min)显着相关。这代表了通风患者的平均过期V?二氧化碳的14%。在脱气室中除去仅1.3?ml / min CO 2,表明二氧化碳在膜过滤器上几乎完全清除。在过滤器之前和过滤器未统计学不同之后,在流出物中的TCO2值。在柠檬酸盐或NaCl 0.9%序列下的跨膜TCO2也没有显着差异。在整个CVVH电路中没有观察到V≤O2的变化。基于记录的数据,构建公式,允许床边评估CVVH可归解型CO2去除。通过CVVH除去相关量的CO 2,可以通过电路内的一个简单的血气分析量化。未来的研究应该评估这种观察的临床影响。该试验在10月192,017的审判登记号码NCT03314363的HTTPS://Clinicaltrials.gov注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号