首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Prolotherapy injections and physiotherapy used singly and in combination for lateral epicondylalgia: a single-blinded randomised clinical trial
【24h】

Prolotherapy injections and physiotherapy used singly and in combination for lateral epicondylalgia: a single-blinded randomised clinical trial

机译:单独使用的无缓解疗法和物理疗法和侧面髁上的组合使用:单一盲目的随机临床试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND:Lateral epicondylalgia (tennis elbow) is a common, debilitating and often treatment-resistant condition. Two treatments thought to address the pathology of lateral epicondylalgia are hypertonic glucose plus lignocaine injections (prolotherapy) and a physiotherapist guided manual therapy/exercise program (physiotherapy). This trial aimed to compare the short- and long-term clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and safety of prolotherapy used singly and in combination with physiotherapy.METHODS:Using a single-blinded randomised clinical trial design, 120 participants with lateral epicondylalgia of at least 6 weeks' duration were randomly assigned to prolotherapy (4 sessions, monthly intervals), physiotherapy (weekly for 4 sessions) or combined (prolotherapy+physiotherapy). The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and participant global impression of change scores were assessed by blinded evaluators at baseline, 6, 12, 26 and 52?weeks. Success rate was defined as the percentage of participants indicating elbow condition was either 'much improved' or 'completely recovered.' Analysis was by intention-to-treat.RESULTS:Eighty-eight percent completed the 12-month assessment. At 52?weeks, there were substantial, significant improvements compared with baseline status for all outcomes and groups, but no significant differences between groups. The physiotherapy group exhibited greater reductions in PRTEE at 12?weeks than the prolotherapy group (p?=?0.014).CONCLUSION:There were no significant differences amongst the Physiotherapy, Prolotherapy and Combined groups in PRTEE and global impression of change measures over the course of the 12-month trial.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ACTRN12612000993897 .
机译:背景:外侧胶囊(网球肘)是一种常见的,衰弱和经常治疗的病症。两种治疗方法认为解决侧面髁痛的病理学是高渗葡萄糖加上木质科因特注射(ProMotherapy)和物理治疗师指导手动治疗/运动程序(物理疗法)。该试验旨在比较单独和与物理疗法组合使用的短期和长期临床效果,成本效益和安全性。方法:使用单一盲目的随机临床试验设计,至少有120名参与者,至少是侧髁颌骨痛6周龄的持续时间被随机分配给ProLotherapy(4次,每月间隔),物理治疗(每周4个会议)或组合(ProLOurateapy + Physiotopy)。盲目的评估员在基线,6,12,26和52?周内评估患者额定网球弯头评估(PRTEE)和参与者全球变更评分的印象。成功率被定义为指示肘部条件的参与者的百分比是“彻底改善”或“完全恢复”。分析是通过意向治疗的。结果:八十八百百分之八十八十八个评估。在52个星期内,与所有结果和群体的基线状态相比,存在大量,显着的改善,但组之间没有显着差异。物理治疗组在PrTee中在12个月比Prophoturepation组(P?= 0.014)展出更大减少在12个月的试验中.Tiral注册:ACTRN12612000993897。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号