首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumental fusion the NORDSTEN degenerative spondylolisthesis trial (NORDSTEN-DS); study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumental fusion the NORDSTEN degenerative spondylolisthesis trial (NORDSTEN-DS); study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:单独减压与减压与仪器融合的解压缩Nordsten退化脊柱晶体ishissis(nordsten-ds);用于随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Fusion in addition to decompression has become the standard treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The evidence for performing fusion among these patients is conflicting and there is a need for further investigation through studies of high quality. The present protocol describes an ongoing study with the primary aim of comparing the outcome between decompression alone and decompression with instrumented fusion. The secondary aim is to investigate whether predictors can be used to choose the best treatment for an individual. The trial, named the NORDSTEN-DS trial, is one of three studies in the Norwegian Degenerative Spinal Stenosis (NORDSTEN) study. The NORDSTEN-DS trial is a block-randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority study with two parallel groups. The surgeons at the 15 participating hospitals decide whether a patient is eligible or not according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participating patients are randomized to either a midline preserving decompression or a decompression followed by an instrumental fusion. Primary endpoint is the percentage of patients with an improvement in Oswestry Disability Index version 2.0 of more than 30% from baseline to 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measurements are the Zürich Claudication Questionnaire, Numeric Rating Scale for back and leg pain, Euroqol 5 dimensions questionnaire, Global perceived effect scale, complications and several radiological parameters. Analysis and interpretation of results will also be conducted after 5 and 10?years. The NORDSTEN/DS trial has the potential to provide Level 1 evidence of whether decompression alone should be advocated as the preferred method or not. Further on the study will investigate whether predictors exist and if they can be used to make the appropriate choice for surgical treatment for this patient group. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02051374 . First Posted: January 31, 2014. Last Update Posted: February 14, 2018.
机译:除了减压外,融合已成为腰椎狭窄的标准治疗与退行性脊柱脊髓肌细胞区(DS)。在这些患者中表现融合的证据是相互冲突的,并且需要通过高质量的研究进一步调查。本协议描述了一个正在进行的研究,其主要目的是将单独减压与用仪器融合的减压之间的结果进行比较。二次目的是调查是否可以使用预测因子来选择个人的最佳治疗方法。该试验,名为Nordsten-DS试验,是挪威退行性脊柱狭窄(Nordsten)研究中的三项研究之一。 Nordsten-DS试验是一个块随机,受控,多中心,非劣级不适性,具有两个平行组。 15个参与医院的外科医生决定了患者是否符合条件或根据包含和排除标准。参与患者随机化为中线保存减压或减压,然后是仪器融合。主要终点是患者的百分比,患者患者患者患者患者从基线到2年后续30%以上的30%以上。次要结果测量是苏黎世克达判问问卷,背部和腿部疼痛的数值评级规模,欧元季度5尺寸调查问卷,全局感知效果规模,并发症和几种放射性参数。结果的分析和解释也将在5到10年后进行。 Nordsten / DS试验有可能提供1级别的证据表明是否应该被提倡作为优选的方法。 Further on the study will investigate whether predictors exist and if they can be used to make the appropriate choice for surgical treatment for this patient group. ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02051374。首页发布:2014年1月31日。上次更新发布:2018年2月14日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号