首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Comparing the effects of different dynamic sitting strategies in wheelchair seating on lumbar-pelvic angle
【24h】

Comparing the effects of different dynamic sitting strategies in wheelchair seating on lumbar-pelvic angle

机译:不同动态坐在腰部座椅上的不同动态坐着策略的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Prolonged static sitting in a wheelchair is associated with an increased risk of lower back pain. The wheelchair seating system is a key factor of this risk because it affects spinal loading in the sitting position. In this study, 7 dynamic sitting strategies (DSSs) are examined: lumbar prominent dynamic sitting (LPDS), back reclined dynamic sitting (BRDS), femur upward dynamic sitting (FUDS), lumbar prominent with back reclined dynamic sitting (LBDS), lumbar prominent with femur upward dynamic sitting (LFDS), back reclined with femur upward dynamic sitting (BFDS), and lumbar prominent with back reclined with femur upward dynamic sitting (LBFDS). The objective of this study was to analyze the biomechanical effects of these sitting strategies on lumbar-pelvic angles. Methods Twenty able-bodied participants were recruited for the study. All participants performed LPDS, BRDS, FUDS, LBDS, LFDS, BFDS, and LBFDS in a random order. All lumbar-pelvic angle parameters, including the static lumbar angle, static pelvic angle, lumbar range of motion, and pelvic range of motion were measured and compared. Results Results show that LBDS and LBFDS enabled the most beneficial lumbar movements, although the difference between the 2 strategies was nonsignificant. BRDS and BFDS enabled the most beneficial pelvic movements, although the difference between the 2 strategies was nonsignificant. Among all the upright DSSs, LPDS and LFDS enabled the most beneficial lumbar and pelvic movements, although no significant difference was observed between these 2 strategies. Conclusions We identified the effects and differences among 7 DSSs on lumbar-pelvic angles. Wheelchair users can choose the most suitable DSS that meets their needs. These findings may serve as a reference for practicing physicians or wheelchair users to choose an appropriate dynamic wheelchair seating system. Trial registration ISRCTN12389808 , 18th November 2016, retrospectively registered.
机译:背景技术延长静态坐在轮椅上与腰部疼痛的风险增加有关。轮椅座椅系统是这种风险的关键因素,因为它会影响坐姿的脊柱载荷。在这项研究中,检查了7次动态休息策略(DSSS):腰部突出动态坐(LPD),后退斜倚动态坐姿(BRD),股骨向上动态坐姿(FUD),腰椎突出的腰部突出的动态坐着(LBDS),腰椎与股骨上升动态坐(LFDS)突出,背部与股骨向上动态坐姿(BFDS),背部突出,背部与股骨向上动态坐着(LBFDS)接近。本研究的目的是分析这些坐在腰骨角对腰巴角的生物力学效应。方法招募了20个能够为此的参与者进行研究。所有参与者以随机顺序执行LPDS,BRDS,FUDS,LBDS,LFDS,BFD和LBFD。测定了所有腰巴角参数,包括静态腰角,静态骨盆角,腰部运动范围和骨盆运动范围。结果结果表明,LBD和LBFDS使最有益的腰椎运动使得2个策略之间的差异不显着。 BRDS和BFDS使最有益的盆腔运动能够,尽管2个策略之间的差异是无情的。在所有直立的DSSS中,LPD和LFD都是使最有益的腰椎和盆腔运动,尽管在这两种策略之间没有观察到显着差异。结论我们在腰盆腔角上鉴定了7个DSS之间的效果和差异。轮椅用户可以选择满足其需求的最适合的DSS。这些发现可以作为练习医生或轮椅用户选择合适的动态轮椅座椅系统的参考。试验登记ISRCTN12389808,2016年11月18日,回顾性地注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号