首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer >First-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

First-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:针对患有激素受体阳性,HER2阴性转移性乳腺癌的绝经后患者的一线内分泌治疗:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background In establishing the 2018 Breast Cancer Practice Guidelines of the Japan Breast Cancer Society, we explored the optimal first-line endocrine therapy for advanced postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Methods We performed a systematic review of relevant reports from randomized-controlled studies published prior to November 2016 found using medical journal search engines. The main outcomes which we evaluated were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (CBR), and toxicity. Results Four controlled trials comparing aromatase inhibitors (AI) and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitor combination therapy to AI monotherapy, and two controlled trials comparing anastrozole to fulvestrant 500?mg were analyzed. AI/CDK4/6 inhibitor combination therapy significantly improved PFS (Risk Ratio: 0.67, 95%CI 0.60–0.73), increased ORR (Risk Difference: 0.11, 95% CI 0.07–0.16), and increased CBR (Risk Difference: 0.11, 95% CI 0.07–0.15), compared with AI monotherapy. Patients who received this combination therapy had a higher grade?≥?3 adverse event rate more than those who received AI monotherapy (Risk Difference: 43%, 95%CI: 0.39–0.47). Fulvestrant 500?mg alone significantly improved PFS (risk ratio: 0.85, 95%CI 0.72–0.98), but ORR and CBR were similar to those of anastrozole alone. Conclusion In the first-line treatment for advanced postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, a combination therapy of CDK4/6 inhibitors and AI showed significant improvement of PFS, ORR, and CBR but with significant increased toxicities compared with AI alone. Fulvestrant 500?mg monotherapy significantly prolonged PFS compared with AI monotherapy. We must wait for the results of the studies with longer follow-up period.
机译:背景技术在建立日本乳腺癌社会的2018年乳腺癌实践指南中,我们探讨了晚期绝经后激素受体阳性乳腺癌的最佳第一线内分泌治疗。方法我们对2016年11月之前发布的随机对照研究的相关报告进行了系统审查,该研究使用医学期刊搜索引擎发现。我们评估的主要结果是无进展生存(PFS),客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(CBR)和毒性。结果四种对照试验将芳族酶抑制剂(AI)和细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)4/6抑制剂联合治疗与AI单疗法进行分析,并分析了将Anstrozole与Fulvestrant 500〜Mg进行比较的可控试验。 AI / CDK4 / 6抑制剂联合治疗显着改善PFS(风险比率:0.67,95%CI 0.60-0.73),orr增加(风险差异:0.11,95%CI 0.07-0.16),增加CBR(风险差异:0.11, 95%CI 0.07-0.15),与AI单疗法相比。接受这种联合治疗的患者具有更高的级别?≥?3个不良事件率超过那些接受AI单药治疗的人(风险差异:43%,95%CI:0.39-0.47)。单独的PFS(风险率:0.85,95%CI 0.72-0.98),单独溢出500克(风险率)显着改善,但ORR和CBR与单独的人类相似。结论在先进后绝经血管激素受体阳性乳腺癌的一线治疗中,CDK4 / 6抑制剂和AI的组合治疗表现出PFS,ORR和CBR的显着改善,但与单独的AI相比,毒性显着增加。氟斯特朗500?Mg单药治疗与AI单一疗法相比,PFS显着延长了PFS。我们必须等待研究结果,随访时间更长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号