...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Bioinformatics >Gene length corrected trimmed mean of M-values (GeTMM) processing of RNA-seq data performs similarly in intersample analyses while improving intrasample comparisons
【24h】

Gene length corrected trimmed mean of M-values (GeTMM) processing of RNA-seq data performs similarly in intersample analyses while improving intrasample comparisons

机译:基因长度校正的M值(Getmm)处理的修剪均值(Getmm)处理RNA-SEQ数据的处理在狭义分析中同样在改善intarAlample比较时进行了类似的

获取原文

摘要

Current normalization methods for RNA-sequencing data allow either for intersample comparison to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes or for intrasample comparison for the discovery and validation of gene signatures. Most studies on optimization of normalization methods typically use simulated data to validate methodologies. We describe a new method, GeTMM, which allows for both inter- and intrasample analyses with the same normalized data set. We used actual (i.e. not simulated) RNA-seq data from 263 colon cancers (no biological replicates) and used the same read count data to compare GeTMM with the most commonly used normalization methods (i.e. TMM (used by edgeR), RLE (used by DESeq2) and TPM) with respect to distributions, effect of RNA quality, subtype-classification, recurrence score, recall of DE genes and correlation to RT-qPCR data. We observed a clear benefit for GeTMM and TPM with regard to intrasample comparison while GeTMM performed similar to TMM and RLE normalized data in intersample comparisons. Regarding DE genes, recall was found comparable among the normalization methods, while GeTMM showed the lowest number of false-positive DE genes. Remarkably, we observed limited detrimental effects in samples with low RNA quality. We show that GeTMM outperforms established methods with regard to intrasample comparison while performing equivalent with regard to intersample normalization using the same normalized data. These combined properties enhance the general usefulness of RNA-seq but also the comparability to the many array-based gene expression data in the public domain.
机译:RNA测序数据的当前归一化方法允许术语含有差异比较,以鉴定差异表达(DE)基因或用于发现和验证基因签名的肠化比较。大多数关于归一化方法优化的研究通常使用模拟数据来验证方法。我们描述了一种新的方法GetMm,它允许使用相同的归一化数据集进行间隔和interAlample分析。我们使用来自263个冒号癌的实际(即未模拟)RNA-SEQ数据(无生物复制)并使用相同的读数数据来比较GetMm与最常用的归一化方法(即TMM(由Edger使用),RLE(使用)通过Deseq2)和TPM)关于分布,RNA质量,亚型分类,复发评分,召回De基因的效果和与RT-QPCR数据的相关性。我们观察到GetMM和TPM在intraseMple比较方面的明确益处,而GetMM类似于TMM和RLE归一下数据中的RLE标准数据。关于DE基因,发现召回在归一化方法中的相当,而GETMM显示出最低数量的假阳性DE基因。值得注意的是,我们观察到具有低RNA质量的样品中的有限效应。我们表明GetMm优于intraseMple比较的建立方法,同时使用相同的归一化数据执行相同的归一化相当于匹配。这些组合性质增强了RNA-SEQ的一般有用性,但也可以是对公共领域中许多基于阵列的基因表达数据的可比性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号