首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Has teaching about intellectual disability healthcare in Australian medical schools improved? A 20-year comparison of curricula audits
【24h】

Has teaching about intellectual disability healthcare in Australian medical schools improved? A 20-year comparison of curricula audits

机译:有关澳大利亚医学院的智力残疾医疗教学的教学改善了吗?课程审计的20年比较

获取原文
       

摘要

People with intellectual disability (ID) have multiple and complex health needs, more frequent healthcare episodes, and experience poorer health outcomes. Research conducted two decades ago showed that medical professionals were lacking in the knowledge and skills required to address the complex needs of this patient group. The aim of the current study was to determine whether Australian undergraduate medical schools that offer ID health education content had changed the amount and nature of such teaching over this period. Identical or equivalent questionnaire items were compared across eight Australian medical schools that participated in curricula audits conducted in 1995 (referred to as T1) and 2013/14 (T2). The audits were of the nature of the ID content, methods used to teach it, and who taught it. There was no significant difference in the number of hours of compulsory ID content offered to medical students at T2 (total?=?158.3?h; median?=?2.8?h per ID unit) compared with T1 (total?=?171?h; median?=?2.5?h). At T2 compared with T1, units with ID content taught in the area of general practice had increased (2?units; 3.6% to 7?units; 16.3%), while decreases were seen in paediatrics (22?units; 40.0% to 10?units; 23.3%) and psychiatry (10?units; 18.2% to 4?units; 9.3%). The number of schools using problem- and/or enquiry-based learning rose to six at T2 from one at T1. Inclusive teaching practices (people with ID develop or deliver content) in compulsory/elective units had increased at T2 (10?units; 23.3%) compared with T1 (6?units; 10.9%), but direct clinical contact with people with ID had decreased (29?units; 52.7% to 11?units; 25.6%). Overall, little progress has been made to address the gaps in ID education for medical students identified from an audit conducted in 1995. Renewal of ID content in medical curricula is indicated as a key element in efforts to improve workforce capacity in this area and reduce barriers to care, with the aim of reversing the poor health outcomes currently seen for this group.
机译:具有智力残疾人(ID)的人具有多种和复杂的健康需求,更频繁的医疗保健剧集,并体验较差的健康结果。在二十年前进行的研究表明,医学专业人员缺乏满足该患者组的复杂需求所需的知识和技能。目前的研究目的是确定提供身份证健康教育内容的澳大利亚本科医学院是否改变了此期间此类教学的金额和性质。将相同或等同的问卷项目进行了比较八个澳大利亚医学院,参加了1995年(称为T1)和2013/14(T2)进行的课程审核。审核是ID内容的性质,用于教授它的方法,谁教了它。与T1相比,向医学学生提供给医学生的强制性身份证率的小时数没有显着差异(总?=?= 158.3?H;每个ID单位)(总共?=?171? H;中位数?=?2.5?H)。在T2与T1相比,在一般实践领域教授的ID内容的单位增加(2?单位; 3.6%至7个?单位; 16.3%),同时在儿科(22个单位;单位; 40.0%至10个?单位; 23.3%)和精神病学(10个?单位; 18.2%至4个?单位; 9.3%)。使用问题和/或询问的学习的学校数量从T2的T2上升到六个。与T1(6?单位; 10.9%)相比,在强制性/选修单位中的包含教学实践(ID发展或提供内容的人)增加(10?单位; 10.9%),但与ID的人直接临床接触减少(29?单位; 52.7%至11?单位; 25.6%)。总体而言,在1995年进行的审计中确定的医学生进展情况下,已经取得了很少的进展。医学课程的ID内容的更新被称为提高该领域劳动力能力的关键因素,降低障碍为了关心,旨在扭转目前为此集团看到的健康成果差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号