首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Predictive validity of the National Benchmark Test and National Senior Certificate for the academic success of first-year medical students at one South African university
【24h】

Predictive validity of the National Benchmark Test and National Senior Certificate for the academic success of first-year medical students at one South African university

机译:一南非大学第一年医学院学术成功的国家基准测试和国家高级证书的预测有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

South African medical schools use the results of the National Senior Certificate (NSC) examination for selecting students. Five of the nine medical schools also use the National Benchmark Test (NBT). The University of the Witwatersrand weights the NSC and NBT results equally in the selection process. This study addresses the predictive validity of the NBT and NSC for academic success. The association between the NBT proficiency levels and students’ progression outcomes was also investigated. Data obtained from the University’s Business Intelligence Services for 1652 first-year medical students from 2011 to 2017 were analysed using hierarchical regression models and chi-square tests. The three NBT domains and four of the NSC subjects were the independent variables in the regression models, with the first-year grade point average for students who passed the first year as the dependant variable. The NBT performance levels and first-year progression outcome (passed, failed, or cancelled) were used in the chi-square analysis. Frequency tables were used to describe the cohort’s demographic details and NBT results. Crosstabs were used to analyse student performance according to the school quintile system. The three NBT domains explained 26% of the variance, which was statistically significant, R2?=?0.263, F (3, 1232)?=?146.78, p??0.000. When the NSC subjects (Life Sciences, English, Mathematics, and Physical Science) were added to the regression equation, they accounted for an additional 19% of the variance, R2?=?0.188, F (3, 1229)?=?137.14, p??0.000. All independent variables contributed 45% of the variance, R2?=?0.451, F (6, 1229)?=?166.29, p??0.000. A strong association between the NBT proficiency levels and first-year students’ progression outcomes was observed. The NBT results, when weighted equally to the NSC results, explained more variance than the NSC alone in predicting academic success in the first year of the medical degree. The NBT should not only be used for selecting medical students but should also be used to place students with lower entry-level skills in appropriate foundation programmes and to identify students who are admitted to regular programmes who may need additional support.
机译:南非医学院利用国家级高级证书(NSC)考试的结果来选择学生。九所医学院中的五种也使用国家基准测试(NBT)。 Witwatersrand大学在选择过程中同样重量NSC和NBT的结果。本研究解决了NBT和NSC的预测有效性,用于学术成功。还调查了NBT熟练程度和学生进展结果之间的关联。从2011年到2017年从大学的商业情报服务获得的数据从2011年到2017年获得了2011年到2017年的752名医学院,并使用分层回归模型和Chi-Square测试进行了分析。第三个NBT域和四个NSC科目是回归模型中的独立变量,为第一年作为受抚养变量传递的学生的一年成绩平均值。在Chi-Square分析中使用了NBT性能水平和第一年进展结果(通过,失败或取消)。频率表用于描述队列的人口统计细节和NBT结果。克罗斯塔布用于根据学校五分类系统分析学生表现。三个NBT结构域解释了26%的差异,其统计学意义r2?=?0.263,f(3,1232)?=?146.78,p?<0.000。当添加到回归方程中的NSC科目(生命科学,英语,数学和物理科学)时,他们占额外的19%的方差,R2?=?0.188,F(3,1229)?=?137.14 ,p?<?0.000。所有独立变量占差异的45%,r2?=?0.451,f(6,1229)?=?166.29,p?<0.000。观察到NBT熟练程度和第一年学生进展结果之间的强劲联系。当与NSC结果同样加权时,NBT结果,解释了比NSC在医疗学位的第一年预测学术成功方面的比较方差更多。 NBT不仅用于选择医学生,还应用于将学生放置在适当的基础方案中的入门级技能较低,并识别入住可能需要额外支持的常规计划的学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号