首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >Complications of cricothyroidotomy versus tracheostomy in emergency surgical airway management: a systematic review
【24h】

Complications of cricothyroidotomy versus tracheostomy in emergency surgical airway management: a systematic review

机译:CricothyroidoTomy对应急手术通道管理中的克里克芹素的并发症:系统评论

获取原文
           

摘要

Airway guidelines recommend an emergency surgical airway as a potential life-saving treatment in a “Can’t Intubate, Can’t Oxygenate” (CICO) situation. Surgical airways can be achieved either through a cricothyroidotomy or tracheostomy. The current literature has limited data regarding complications of cricothyroidotomy and tracheostomy in an emergency situation. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze complications following cricothyroidotomy and tracheostomy in airway emergencies. This synthesis of literature was exempt from ethics approval. Eight databases were searched from inception to October 2018, using a comprehensive search strategy. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials or observational studies reporting complications following emergency surgical airway. Complications were classified as minor (evolving to spontaneous remission or not requiring intervention or not persisting chronically), major (requiring intervention or persisting chronically), early (from the start of the procedure up to 7 days) and late (beyond 7 days of the procedure). We retrieved 2659 references from our search criteria. Following the removal of duplicates, title and abstract review, 33 articles were selected for full-text reading. Twenty-one articles were finally included in the systematic review. We found no differences in minor, major or early complications between the two techniques. However, late complications were significantly more frequent in the tracheostomy group [OR (95% CI) 0.21 (0.20–0.22), p??0.0001]. Our results demonstrate that cricothyroidotomies performed in emergent situations resulted in fewer late complications than tracheostomies. This finding supports the recommendations from the latest Difficult Airway Society (DAS) guidelines regarding using cricothyroidotomy as the technique of choice for emergency surgical airway. However, emergency cricothyroidotomies should be converted to tracheostomies in a timely fashion as there is insufficient evidence to suggest that emergency cricothyrotomies are long term airways.
机译:Airway Guidelines推荐紧急手术气道作为“无法插管,不能含氧化合物”(Cico)情况。通过克里克酚酶或气管造口术可以实现手术气道。目前的文献在紧急情况下,有关Cricothyroidomy和气管造口术的并发症的数据有限。该系统审查的目的是分析Cricothyroidocy和气道紧急情况下的气管造口术后并发症。这种文献的合成免于伦理批准。从2018年10月开始搜索八个数据库,使用全面的搜索策略。如果它们是随机对照试验或观察研究报告应急外科气道后的并发症,则包括研究。并发症被归类为未成年人(演变为自发的缓解或不需要干预或不持久地持续到长期),早期(从程序开始长达7天的开始)和迟到(超过7天程序)。我们从搜索标准中检索了2659个参考。在删除重复项后,标题和抽象评论,选择33篇文章进行全文阅读。第二十一篇文章最终纳入系统审查中。我们发现两种技术之间的未成年人,主要或早期并发症的差异。然而,在气管造口术中的晚期并发症在[或(95%CI)0.21(0.20-0.22),p≤0.0001]中显着更频繁。我们的结果表明,在紧急情况下进行的克里克替偶甲型瘤引起了比气管遗言更少的并发症。这一发现支持关于使用CricothyroidoTomy的最新困难气道协会(DAS)指南的建议作为急诊手术气道的选择技术。然而,应急的克里克替偶甲状腺素应及时转化为气管造称,因为没有足够的证据表明应急的Cricothytomies是长期的气道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号