首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >No radiographic index predicts difficult intubation using the Optiscope? in cervical spine surgery patients: a retrospective study
【24h】

No radiographic index predicts difficult intubation using the Optiscope? in cervical spine surgery patients: a retrospective study

机译:没有射线照相指数预测使用Optiscope困难的插管?在颈椎外科患者中:回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The Optiscope? can be used for intubation with minimal neck motion. We retrospectively investigated radiographic predictors of difficult intubation using the Optiscope? by analyzing preoperative radiographic images. One hundred eighty-four patients who were intubated with the Optiscope? under manual in-line cervical stabilization for cervical spine surgery were enrolled. Radiographic indices were measured on preoperative cervical spine lateral X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging images. Difficult intubation was defined as failure or time consumption more than 90?s on the first attempt. To identify significant predictors of difficult intubation using the Optiscope? and evaluate their diagnostic value, multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used. Fourty-seven patients showed difficult intubation. There was no significant difference in radiographic indices between the difficult and easy intubation groups, but higher body mass index (BMI) (26.5 [3.0] vs. 24.6 [3.5] kg/m2, P?=?0.001), shorter sternomental distance (SMD) (122.0 [104.0 to 150.0] vs. 150.0 [130.0 to 170.0] mm, P?=?0.001), shorter interincisor gap (40.0 [35.0 to 45.0] vs. 43.0 [40.0 to 50.0] mm, P?=?0.006), and higher incidence of excessive oral secretions (10.6% vs. 2.9%, P?=?0.049) were observed in patients with difficult intubation. In multivariable analysis, BMI (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; 1.15 [1.03 to 1.28], P?=?0.011) and SMD (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; 0.98 [0.97 to 1.00], P?=?0.008) were associated with difficult intubation with the Optiscope?. In receiver operating characterstic analysis, the area under the curve for body mass index was 0.68 (95% confidence interval; 0.60 to 0.77, P??0.001) and that for sternomental distance was 0.66 (95% confience interval; 0.57 to 0.75, P?=?0.001). The incidence of difficult intubation using the Optiscope? under manual in-line cervical stabilization was 25.5% in cervical spine surgery patients. No significant predictor of difficult intubation with the Optiscope? was identified among the measured radiographic indices. Although high BMI and short SMD were predictive of difficult intubation with the Optiscope?, their discrimination power was weak.
机译:倒退镜片?可用于具有最小颈部运动的插管。我们回顾性地调查了使用Optiscope难以插管的射线照相预测因子?通过分析术前放射线图像。一百八十四名患者用倒退镜片插管?根据手动在线宫颈稳定,宫颈脊柱手术进行注册。在术前宫颈脊柱横向X射线和磁共振成像图像上测量射线照相索引。在第一次尝试时,困难的插管被定义为失败或时间超过90?使用倒退镜片识别难以插管的重要预测因子?并评估其诊断值,使用多变量逻辑回归和接收器操作特征分析。四十七名患者表现出难以插管。难以轻易易于插管组之间的放射线指数没有显着差异,但体重指数较高(BMI)(26.5 [3.0]与24.6 [3.5] kg / m2,p?= 0.001),较短的缩放距离( SMD)(122.0 [104.0至150.0]与150.0 [130.0至170.0] mm,p?= 0.001),较短的Intrincisor间隙(40.0 [35.0至45.0]与43.0 [40.0至50.0] mm,p?=?在难以插管的患者中观察到0.006),并且过度口腔分泌物的发生率过多的口腔分泌物(10.6%,p?= 0.049)。在多变量分析中,BMI(差距[95%置信区间]; 1.15 [1.03至1.28],p?= 0.011)和SMD(差距[95%置信区间]; 0.98 [0.97至1.00],p?= 0.008)与倒闭难以插管有关?在接收器操作特征分析中,体重指数曲线下的面积为0.68(95%置信区间; 0.60至0.77,P≤0.01),其归属距离为0.66(95%奇异间隔; 0.57至0.75, p?= 0.001)。使用倒退镜片难以插管的发生率?根据手工在线宫颈稳定,宫颈脊柱手术患者的25.5%。没有明显的预测因子与倒退镜片难以插管?在测量的射线照相指数中被识别出来。虽然高BMI和SHOL SMD与幻想易用的预测性易于插管,但它们的辨别力较弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号