首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Systematic review of the effect of training interventions on the skills of health professionals in promoting health behaviour, with meta-analysis of subsequent effects on patient health behaviours
【24h】

Systematic review of the effect of training interventions on the skills of health professionals in promoting health behaviour, with meta-analysis of subsequent effects on patient health behaviours

机译:系统审查培训干预措施对促进健康行为的卫生专业人士技能的影响,荟萃分析随后对患者健康行为的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:We aimed to identify, synthesise and evaluate randomised control trial evidence on the effects of healthcare professional training on the delivery quality of health behaviour change interventions and, subsequently, on patient health behaviours.METHODS:Systematic review with narrative synthesis of effects on delivery quality and meta-analysis of health behaviour outcomes. We searched: Medline, EMBASE, PsychInfo, AMED, CINAHL Plus and the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials up to March 2019. Studies were included if they were in English and included intervention delivery quality as an outcome. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (registration: CRD42019124502).RESULTS:Twelve-studies were identified as suitable for inclusion. All studies were judged as being high risk of bias with respect to training quality outcomes. However with respect to behavioural outcomes, only two of the six studies included in the meta-analysis had a high risk and four had some concerns. Educational elements (e.g. presentations) were used in all studies and nine included additional practical learning tasks. In eight studies reporting delivery quality, 54% of healthcare professional communication outcomes and 55% of content delivery outcomes improved in the intervention arm compared to controls. Training that included both educational and practical elements tended to be more effective. Meta-analysis of patient health behavioural outcomes in six-studies found significant improvements (Standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.20, 95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.28, P??0.0001, Isup2/sup?=?0%). No significant difference was found between short (≤6-months) and long-term (?6-months) outcomes (SMD: 0.25 vs 0.15; P?=?0.31).CONCLUSIONS:Delivery quality of health behaviour change interventions appears to improve following training and consequently to improve health behaviours. Future studies should develop more concise /integrated measures of delivery quality and develop optimal methods of training delivery.
机译:背景:我们旨在识别,综合和评估随访的控制试验证据,了解医疗保健专业培训对健康行为变化干预措施的交付质量的影响,随后,患者健康行为。方法:系统审查与交付影响的叙事综合健康行为结果的质量和荟萃分析。我们搜索了:Medline,Embase,Psychinfo,AMED,Cinahl Plus和Cochrane Central的控制试验中央登记册,直至2019年3月。如果他们是英语,则包括介入作为结果的干预交付质量。系统评价在Prospero上注册(注册:CRD42019124502)。结果:重新研究被确定为适合包含。所有研究均被评判为培训质量结果方面的高风险。然而,关于行为结果,在Meta分析中只包含的六项研究中只有两个具有高风险,而且有四项有一些担忧。所有研究中使用教育要素(例如,演示文稿),九个包括额外的额外实用学习任务。在八项研究中报告提供质量,54%的医疗保健专业沟通结果和55%的内容交付结果与控制权有关控制。包括教育和实际元素的培训往往更有效。六项研究中患者健康行为结果的荟萃分析发现显着改善(标准化平均差异(SMD):0.20,95%置信区间:0.11至0.28,p?<0.0001,I 2 ? =?0%)。在短(≤6个月)和长期(> 6个月)结果中没有发现显着差异(SMD:0.25 Vs 0.15; P?=?0.31).Conclusions:运送质量的健康行为改变干预措施培训后改善,从而改善健康行为。未来的研究应制定更简洁/综合的交付质量措施,并开发培训交付的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号