首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Cost utility analysis of reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adolescence and young adult with severe thalassemia compared to hypertransfusion and iron chelation program
【24h】

Cost utility analysis of reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adolescence and young adult with severe thalassemia compared to hypertransfusion and iron chelation program

机译:与血液复苏血症严重血液复苏血症的青春期和青少年血管生成干细胞移植降低的成本实用性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Hematopoieticic stem cell transplantation is the only therapeutic option that can cure thalassemia disease. Reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RI-HSCT) has demonstrated a high cure rate with minimal complications compared to other options. Because RI-HSCT is very costly, economic justification for its value is needed. This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility of RI-HSCT compared with blood transfusions combined with iron chelating therapy (BT-ICT) for adolescent and young adult with severe thalassemia in Thailand. Methods A Markov model was used to estimate the relevant costs and health outcomes over the patients’ lifetimes using a societal perspective. All future costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per annum. The efficacy of RI-HSCT was based a clinical trial including a total of 18 thalassemia patients. Utility values were derived directly from all patients using EQ-5D and SF-6D. Primary outcomes of interest were lifetime costs, quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in US ($) per QALY gained. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to investigate the effect of parameter uncertainty. Results In base case analysis, the RI-HSCT group had a better clinical outcomes and higher lifetime costs. The incremental cost per QALY gained was US $ 3,236 per QALY. The acceptability curve showed that the probability of RI-HSCT being cost-effective was 71% at the willingness to pay of 1 time of Thai Gross domestic product per capita (GDP per capita), approximately US $ 4,210 per QALY gained. The most sensitive parameter was utility of severe thalassemia patients without cardiac complication patients. Conclusion At a societal willingness to pay of 1 GDP per capita, RI-HSCT was a cost-effective treatment for adolescent and young adult with severe thalassemia in Thailand compared to BT-ICT.
机译:背景技术造血干细胞移植是唯一可以治愈地中海贫血病的治疗选择。降低的强度造血干细胞移植(RI-HSCT)已经证明了与其他选择相比最小的并发症的高固化速率。因为RI-HSCT非常昂贵,所以需要其价值的经济理由。本研究旨在估算Ri-HSCT与血液输血(BT-ICT)与泰国严重的丘脑血症相结合的血液输血(BT-ICT)相比的成本用力。方法使用社会角度来利用Markov模型来估算患者寿命的相关成本和健康结果。所有未来的成本和结果都以每年3%的速度折扣。 RI-HSCT的疗效基于临床试验,包括共18例患者。使用EQ-5D和SF-6D直接来自所有患者的效用值。主要兴趣结果是终身成本,质量调整的寿命年(QALYS)获得,以及美国QALY的US($)中的增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行单向和概率敏感性分析(PSA)以研究参数不确定性的影响。结果基础案例分析,RI-HSCT组具有更好的临床结果和更高的寿命成本。每个QALY获得的增量费用为每QALY 3,236美元。可接受性曲线表明,RI-HSCT成本效益的概率在愿意支付1次泰国国内产品人均产品(人均GDP),每股QALY约4,210美元。最敏感的参数是严重的中西血症患者没有心脏并发症患者的效用。结论在社会意愿支付1 GDP人均,RI-HSCT是与BT-ICT相比泰国严重的泰国的青少年和年轻成年人的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号