...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques
【24h】

A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques

机译:系统的文献综述,使用最小侵入性和开放手术技术返回腰椎脊髓融合后的工作时间和麻醉用途

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Chronic low back pain is a common health problem for adult workers and causes an enormous economic burden. With the improvement of minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS) in spinal fusion and the development of fusion devices, more lumbar operations are today being performed through a less invasive technique. When compared with open surgeries (OS), MIS has demonstrated better clinical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, complication rates and length of hospital stay. The aim of this review was to identify and summarize evidence on the time to return to work and the duration of post-operation narcotic use for patients who had lumbar spinal fusion operations using MIS and OS techniques. Methods A systematic literature review was performed including studies identified from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, and the Centre for Review and Dissemination (CRD) (January 2004–April 2014) for publications reporting on time to return to work and post-operation narcotic use after MIS or OS lumbar spinal fusion surgeries. Results Out of a total of 36 included studies, 28 reported on the time to return to work and 17 on the narcotic use after MIS or OS. Four studies described the time to return to work directly comparing MIS and OS. Three studies, from the US, directly compared the duration of narcotic use between MIS- transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and OS-TLIF. In addition to the time to return to work, 23 studies reported on the rate of return to work and the employment rate before and after surgery, and two Swedish studies presented sick leave data. Conclusions There is a gap of good quality data describing the time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion operations using MIS or OS techniques. However, the current systematic literature review indicates that patients who have lumbar spinal fusion operations, with the MIS procedure, generally return to work after surgery more quickly and require less post-operation narcotics for pain control compared to patients who have OS.
机译:背景技术慢性低腰疼痛是成人工人的常见健康问题,并导致巨大的经济负担。随着在脊柱融合中的微创手术技术(MIS)的改善和融合装置的发展,今天正在通过较少的侵入性技术进行更多的腰部操作。与公开手术(OS)相比,MIS在包括操作时间,失血,复杂性率和住院时间长度的更好的临床结果。本综述的目的是识别和总结有关使用MIS和OS技术进行腰椎融合操作的患者的持续时间和操作后麻醉用途的证据。方法采用系统文献综述,包括从PubMed,Embase,Cochrane协作和审查和传播中心(2014年1月)的审查和传播中心(2014年1月)进行了研究,以便于报告时间返回工作和后手术后的麻醉在MIS或OS腰椎融合后的手术后使用。结果总共36项包括研究,28日报告了返回工作的时间和17次在MIS或OS后的麻醉使用。四项研究描述了直接比较MIS和OS的时间返回工作。三项研究,来自美国,直接比较了误障突变体腰椎间融合(TLIF)和OS-TLIF之间的麻醉使用持续时间。除了返回工作的时间外,23项研究报告了在手术前后的返回工作率和就业率,两项瑞典研究提出了病假数据。结论使用MIS或OS技术,描述了腰椎融合操作后返回工作和麻醉用途的良好质量数据的差距。然而,目前的系统文献综述表明,患有腰椎融合作业的患者,随着MIS程序,通常迅速恢复工作后,与具有操作系统的患者相比,手术后较少,需要较少的后手术后毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号