首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Doctors’ opinion on the contribution of coordination mechanisms to improving clinical coordination between primary and outpatient secondary care in the Catalan national health system
【24h】

Doctors’ opinion on the contribution of coordination mechanisms to improving clinical coordination between primary and outpatient secondary care in the Catalan national health system

机译:医生对协调机制贡献提高加泰罗尼亚国家卫生系统临床协调临床协调的思考

获取原文
       

摘要

Clinical coordination is considered a health policy priority as its absence can lead to poor quality of care and inefficiency. A key challenge is to identify which strategies should be implemented to improve coordination. The aim is to analyse doctors’ opinions on the contribution of mechanisms to improving clinical coordination between primary and outpatient secondary care and the factors influencing their use. A qualitative descriptive study in three healthcare networks of the Catalan national health system. A two-stage theoretical sample was designed: in the first stage, networks with different management models were selected; in the second, primary care (n?=?26) and secondary care (n?=?24) doctors. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Final sample size was reached by saturation. A thematic content analysis was conducted, segmented by network and care level. With few differences across networks, doctors identified similar mechanisms contributing to clinical coordination: 1) shared EMR facilitating clinical information transfer and uptake; 2) mechanisms enabling problem-solving communication and agreement on clinical approaches, which varied across networks (joint clinical case conferences, which also promote mutual knowledge and training of primary care doctors; virtual consultations through EMR and email); and 3) referral protocols and use of the telephone facilitating access to secondary care after referrals. Doctors identified organizational (insufficient time, incompatible timetables, design of mechanisms) and professional factors (knowing each other, attitude towards collaboration, concerns over misdiagnosis) that influence the use of mechanisms. Mechanisms that most contribute to clinical coordination are feedback mechanisms, that is those based on mutual adjustment, that allow doctors to exchange information and communicate. Their use might be enhanced by focusing on adequate working conditions, mechanism design and creating conditions that promote mutual knowledge and positive attitudes towards collaboration.
机译:临床协调被认为是健康政策的优先事项,因为它的缺席会导致差的护理和效率低劣。关键挑战是确定应实施哪些策略以改善协调。目的是分析医生就改善初级和门诊二次护理之间临床协调的贡献以及影响其使用的因素的贡献。加泰罗尼亚国家卫生系统三个医疗保健网络的定性描述性研究。设计了两阶段理论样本:在第一阶段,选择了不同管理模型的网络;在第二,初级保健(n?=?26)和次要护理(n?=?24)医生。使用半结构化访谈收集数据。通过饱和度达到最终样本量。通过网络和护理水平进行主题内容分析。跨网络差别几乎没有差异,医生确定了促进临床协调的类似机制:1)共享EMR促进临床信息转移和摄取; 2)能够解决问题的机制解决临床方法的沟通和协议,这些临床方法(共同临床案例会议)也促进了对初级护理医生的相互知识和培训;通过EMR和电子邮件的虚拟咨询); 3)推荐协议和使用促进推荐后进行二次护理的电话。医生确定了组织(时间不足,时间表,机制不相容,机制不相容)和专业因素(相互了解,对合作的态度,影响机制使用的误诊)。大多数有助于临床协调的机制是反馈机制,即基于互调整的人,允许医生交换信息和沟通。通过专注于充足的工作条件,机制设计和创造促进相互知识和积极态度的合作的情况,可以提高他们的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号