首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Do primary and secondary care doctors have a different experience and perception of cross-level clinical coordination? Results of a cross-sectional study in the Catalan National Health System (Spain)
【24h】

Do primary and secondary care doctors have a different experience and perception of cross-level clinical coordination? Results of a cross-sectional study in the Catalan National Health System (Spain)

机译:小学和中学医生是否有不同的经验和对跨级别临床协调的感知?加泰罗尼亚国家卫生系统的横断面研究结果(西班牙)

获取原文
           

摘要

Clinical coordination across care levels is a priority for health systems around the world, especially for those based on primary health care. The aim of this study is to analyse the degree of clinical information and clinical management coordination across healthcare levels in the Catalan national health system experienced by primary (PC) and secondary care (SC) doctors and explore the associated factors. Cross-sectional study based on an online survey using the self-administered questionnaire COORDENA-CAT. Data collection: October–December 2017. Study population: PC and SC (acute and long term) doctors of the Catalan national health system. Participation rate was 21%, with a sample of 3308 doctors. Outcome variables: cross-level clinical information coordination, clinical management coordination, and perception of cross-level coordination within the area. Explanatory variables: socio-demographic, employment characteristics, attitude towards job, type of area (according to type of hospital and management), interactional factors, organizational factors and knowledge of existing coordination mechanisms. Stratification variable: level of care. Descriptive and multivariate analysis by logistic regression. The degree of clinical coordination experienced across levels of care was high for both PC and SC doctors, although PC doctors experienced greater exchange and use of information and SC doctors experienced greater consistency of care. However, only 32.13% of PC and 35.72% of SC doctors found that patient care was coordinated across care levels within their area. In both levels of care, knowing the doctors of the other level, working in an area where the same entity manages SC and majority of PC, and holding joint clinical case conferences were factors positively associated with perceiving high levels of clinical coordination. Other associated factors were specific to the care level, such as being informed of a patient’s discharge from hospital for PC doctors, or trusting in the clinical skills of the other care level for SC doctors. Interactional and organizational factors are positively associated with perceiving high levels of clinical coordination. Introducing policies to enhance such factors can foster clinical coordination between different health care levels. The COORDENA questionnaire allows us to identify fields for improvement in clinical coordination.
机译:关注水平的临床协调是世界各地的卫生系统的优先事项,特别是对于基于初级保健的人。本研究的目的是分析主要(PC)和次要护理(SC)医生经历的加泰罗尼亚国家卫生系统的医疗保健水平临床信息和临床管理协调程度,并探索相关因素。基于使用自我管理问卷COORDENA-CAT的在线调查的横断面研究。数据收集:2017年10月至12月。学习人口:PC和SC(急性和长期)加泰罗尼亚国家卫生系统的医生。参与率为21%,样品为3308名医生。结果变量:跨级临床信息协调,临床管理协调和该地区内交叉层面协调的感知。解释性变量:社会人口统计,就业特征,对工作的态度,面积的类型(根据医院和管理类型),互动因素,组织因素和现有协调机制的知识。分层变量:护理水平。通过Logistic回归描述性和多变量分析。虽然PC和SC医生,但PC和SC医生的临床协调程度很高,但PC医生经历了更大的交流和信息,SC医生经历了更大的护理一致性。然而,只有32.13%的PC和35.72%的SC医生发现,患者护理在其地区内的护理水平协调。在整个照顾级别,了解另一级的医生,在同一实体管理SC和大多数PC的领域工作,并持有联合临床案例会议与感知高水平的临床协调有关的因素。其他相关因素是特定于护理水平的,例如被告知患者从医院医院的医院出院,或者信任SC医生其他护理水平的临床技能。互动和组织因素与感知高水平的临床协调呈正相关。介绍增强这些因素的政策可以促进不同医疗水平之间的临床协调。 Coordena调查问卷允许我们识别临床协调的改进的领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号