首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Appraisal of literature reviews on end-of-life care for minority ethnic groups in the UK and a critical comparison with policy recommendations from the UK end-of-life care strategy
【24h】

Appraisal of literature reviews on end-of-life care for minority ethnic groups in the UK and a critical comparison with policy recommendations from the UK end-of-life care strategy

机译:对英国少数民族民族群体的文学审查的评估以及与英国终生护理战略的政策建议的关键比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Evidence of low end-of-life (EoL) care service use by minority ethnic groups in the UK has given rise to a body of research and a number of reviews of the literature. This article aims to review and evaluate literature reviews on minority ethnic groups and EoL care in the UK and assess their suitability as an evidence base for policy. Methods Systematic review. Searches were carried out in thirteen electronic databases, eight journals, reference lists, and grey literature. Reviews were included if they concerned minority ethnic groups and EoL care in the UK. Reviews were graded for quality and key themes identified. Results Thirteen reviews (2001-2009) met inclusion criteria. Seven took a systematic approach, of which four scored highly for methodological quality (a mean score of six, median seven). The majority of systematic reviews were therefore of a reasonable methodological quality. Most reviews were restricted by ethnic group, aspect of EoL care, or were broader reviews which reported relevant findings. Six key themes were identified. Conclusions A number of reviews were systematic and scored highly for methodological quality. These reviews provide a good reflection of the primary evidence and could be used to inform policy. The complexity and inter-relatedness of factors leading to low service use was recognised and reflected in reviews' recommendations for service improvement. Recommendations made in the UK End-of-Life Care Strategy were limited in comparison, and the Strategy's evidence base concerning minority ethnic groups was found to be narrow. Future policy should be embedded strongly in the evidence base to reflect the current literature and minimise bias.
机译:背景技术英国少数民族族裔族裔历史(EOL)护理服务使用的证据引起了一系列研究组和对文献的一些审查。本文旨在审查和评估英国少数民族和EOL护理的文献综述,并评估其适用性作为政策的证据。方法系统审查。搜索在十三个电子数据库,八个期刊,参考列表和灰色文献中进行。如果他们在英国关注少数民族和EOL Care,则包括评论。评估评估了质量和关键主题。结果十三个评论(2001-2009)符合纳入标准。七采取了系统的方法,其中四项高度评分适用于方法论质量(平均得分为六位,中位数七)。因此,大多数系统评价是合理的方法论质量。大多数评论受族裔集团的限制,EOL Care的方面,或者是更广泛的评论,报告了相关调查结果。确定了六个关键主题。结论一些评论是系统性的,并且对方法论质量提供高度评分。这些评论提供了良好的初级证据的反映,可用于通知政策。导致使用低服务使用的复杂性和相关因素的复杂性和相关性得到了认可,并反映在“服务改进的建议”中反映出来。在英国终生护理战略中提出的建议在比较中有限,并发现少数民族族群的战略证据基础是狭隘的。未来的政策应该在证据基础中强烈嵌入,以反映当前的文学并尽量减少偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号