首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychology >An empirical examination of the conceptualization of companion animals
【24h】

An empirical examination of the conceptualization of companion animals

机译:对伴侣动物概念化的实证检查

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The extensive keeping of companion animals and the substantial monetary amount we spend on these animals indicate that they are highly valued. Although the benefits humans derive from keeping cats and dogs have been extensively studied, how we conceptualize these animals has received limited attention. How people conceptualize cats and dogs is important as it influences human behavior and the well-being of humans as well as animals. The objective of this paper was to examine the conceptual meaning of dogs and cats and the relative importance of meanings assigned to these species. Methods Based on a Swedish on-line survey ( n =?2028) the free-elicitation method was used to measure the salience of conceptualizations for dogs and cats as this method measures the accessibility of the focal object in people’s memory. An R-index approach was used to analyze the importance and dominance of attributes on the premise that the order in which attributes were listed by respondents reflects their relative importance. The sum of the choice probability was used to evaluate the stochastic rank order of attributes and Somers’ D was used to examine difference in rankings between groups of respondents. Results For dogs, human well-being in terms of emotional and social support, and emotional attachment ( friendship , love , companionship , joy and loyalty ) were found to be most important while elements related to the animals themselves (e.g. personality of the animal) were found to be less important. For cats, personality of the animal was along with love found to be most important. The results were largely consistent across different types of households. Conclusions The results provide information on the relative importance of salient attributes and thus indicate which attributes that are important to consider, for example, when analyzing human-animal interaction, animal welfare, human health and subjective-well-being, or the economic value of cats and dogs.
机译:背景技术伴侣动物的广泛保持和我们在这些动物上花费的大量货币量表明它们受到高度重视。虽然人类的益处来自保持猫和狗的广泛研究,但我们如何概念化这些动物受到限制的关注。人们如何概念化猫和狗是重要的,因为它影响人类行为和人类的福祉以及动物。本文的目的是研究狗和猫的概念意义以及分配给这些物种的含义的相对重要性。基于瑞典在线测量的方法(n =Δ2028),使用自由射出方法来测量狗和猫的概念化显着性,因为这种方法测量人们记忆中焦点对象的可访问性。 R-Index方法用于分析属性的重要性和优势,以至于受访者列出的属性的命令反映了其相对重要性。选择概率的总和用于评估属性的随机等级顺序,SOMER'D用于检查受访者组之间排名的差异。狗的结果,人类福祉在情感和社会支持方面,以及情感依恋(友谊,爱情,友谊,喜悦和忠诚)最重要,而与动物本身有关的元素(例如动物的个性)被发现不太重要。对于猫,动物的个性与爱情相结合最重要。在不同类型的家庭中,结果在很大一致。结论结果提供了有关突出属性的相对重要性的信息,从而表明,在分析人类互动,动物福利,人类健康和主观福祉时或经济价值的情况下表明这是哪些重要的属性猫和狗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号