首页> 外文期刊>BMC Women s Health >Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix ? barbed suture?and conventional suture?in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study
【24h】

Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix ? barbed suture?and conventional suture?in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study

机译:Bidirectional Stratafix之间的比较?刺绣?和常规缝合线?在腹腔镜肌瘤切除术:回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is one of the techniques feasible for the treatment of intramural myoma. This technique is reported to be difficult when large fibroids are involved because of excessive blood loss during surgery. Skillful and fast suturing appears to be associated with reduced blood loss during LM. In this study we compared the surgical outcomes of using bidirectional Stratafix? barbed suture versus conventional suture during LM. This retrospective study included all patients who underwent LM for the treatment of intramural myoma in our institution between 2015 and 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the technique of suturing during LM: Group 1 comprised patients in whom Stratafix? barbed suture was used (n?=?29), and group 2 comprised those in whom conventional suture was used (n?=?15). Data of patient age, myoma size, the number of myoma nodes, hemoglobin levels, total operation time, total suturing time, and blood loss during surgery were compared between the 2 groups. No significant differences in age (p?=?0.463) or myoma size (P?=?0.373) were observed between the 2 groups. Operation time (P?=?0.0104), suturing time (P?=?0.007), and blood loss (P?=?0.0375) during surgery were significantly less with Stratafix? barbed suture than with conventional suture. No patient required intraoperative transfusion or conversion to laparotomy. The use of bidirectional barbed suture reduces operation time, suturing time, and blood loss. As these new sutures have barbs, no knot-tying is required; thus, continuous suturing becomes very simple and maintaining hemostasis is easy. Unskilled gynecological surgeons who apply this suture technique can also perform LM easily. As the bidirectional barbed suture has multiple points of fixation, this suture technique can reapproximate tissue securely, which reduces the chances of reoperation because of proper suture knotting. Therefore, bidirectional Stratafix? barbed sutures could be an optimal and efficient alternative to conventional sutures for use by gynecological surgeons in Japan.
机译:腹腔镜肌瘤切除术(LM)是治疗intramural肌瘤的技术之一。据报道,由于手术过程中的过度损失,涉及大肌瘤时,难以困难。熟练而快速的缝合似乎与LM期间降低的血液损失有关。在这项研究中,我们比较了使用双向Stratafix的手术结果?在LM期间,带刺的缝合与传统缝合线。该回顾性研究包括在2015年至2020年期间接受LM的所有接受LM的患者,以至于2015年至2020年之间的机构。根据LM缝合的技术,患者分为2组:第1组组成患者Stratafix的患者?使用刺绣(n?=Δ29),第2组包括使用常规缝合线的那些(n?=?15)。在2组之间比较了患者年龄,肌瘤大小,肌瘤节点,血红蛋白水平,总操作时间,总缝合时间和血液损失的数据。在2组之间观察到没有突出的年龄(p?= 0.463)或肌瘤大小(p?= 0.373)。操作时间(p?= 0.0104),缝合时间(p?= 0.007),手术过程中的血液损失(p?= 0.0375)显着较低,术后少少?刺绣比传统缝合线。没有患者需要术中输血或转化为腹腔切开术。双向刺缝合的使用减少了操作时间,缝合时间和失血。由于这些新缝合线具有倒钩,因此不需要结;因此,连续缝合变得非常简单,保持止血方面很容易。应用这种缝合技术的不熟练的妇科外科医生也可以轻松地执行LM。由于双向刺缝有多个固定点,这种缝合技术可以牢固地重新涂覆组织,这减少了由于适当的缝合缝合而降低了重新进食的机会。因此,双向Stratafix?刺缝线可能是日本妇科外科医生使用的传统缝合空间最佳,有效的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号