首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >The outcomes of modified endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors and the value of endoscopic morphology classification in endoscopic resection
【24h】

The outcomes of modified endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors and the value of endoscopic morphology classification in endoscopic resection

机译:用于治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤的改性内窥镜粘膜切除和内镜粘膜粘膜分析的结果及内镜切除内窥镜形态分类的价值

获取原文
       

摘要

To compare the outcomes of modified endoscopic mucosal resection (m-EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and evaluate the value of endoscopic morphology classification?in endoscopic resection?(ER). Patients with rectal NET diameters less than 2?cm who were treated between April 2007 and January 2019 were enrolled. The endoscopic morphology of rectal NETs was classified based on the endoscopic views. Patients who underwent ESD and m-EMR were compared. Baseline characteristics as well as en bloc resection, complete resection, the procedure time, adverse events and the risk factors associated with incomplete resection were analyzed. A total of 429 patients with 449 rectal NETs were enrolled for the classification of endoscopic morphology and were classified into four types (Ia, IIb, II, and III). There were 79 patients in the m-EMR group and 259 patients in the ESD group before matching. Propensity score matching created 77 pairs between the two groups that were well balanced. The mean procedure time was significantly shorter for m-EMR than for ESD (9.1?±?4.4?min vs 16.0?±?7.9?min, P?=?0.000). The rates of en bloc resection (98.7% vs 100%; P?=?1.000), complete resection (90.9% vs 93.5%, P?=?0.548) and adverse events (2.6% vs 2.6%, P?=?1.000) were similar between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that histopathological grade and endoscopic morphology were associated with incomplete resection. Both ESD and m-EMR are effective and safe for the treatment of rectal NETs. Endoscopic morphology should be considered along with histopathological grade for ER.
机译:为了比较改性内镜粘膜切除(M-EMR)和内窥镜粘膜粘膜解剖(ESD)的结果进行直肠神经内分泌肿瘤(净)并评估内窥镜形态分类的价值?在内窥镜切除术中?(ER)。患者在2007年4月至2019年1月间在2007年4月至2019年间治疗的直肠净直径患者。基于内窥镜视图,分类了直肠网的内窥镜形态。比较了ESD和M-EMR的患者。分析了基线特征以及en Bloc切除,完全切除,程序时间,不良事件和与不完全切除相关的危险因素。共有429例449例直肠网的患者,用于分类内窥镜形态,分为四种类型(IA,IIB,II和III)。 M-EMR组中有79名患者和259例ESD组患者匹配前。倾向得分匹配在两个均衡的两组之间创建了77对。平均程序时间比ESD(9.1?±4.4?min vs 16.0?7.9?min,p?= 0.000),M-EMR的平均程序时间明显较短en Bloc切除的速率(98.7%Vs 100%; p?=?1.000),完全切除(90.9%vs 93.5%,p?= 0.548)和不良事件(2.6%Vs 2.6%,p?=?1.000 )两组之间类似。单变量和多变量分析表明,组织病理学级和内窥镜形态与不完全切除有关。 ESD和M-EMR都是有效和安全的直肠网的治疗。应考虑内镜形态与ER的组织病理学等级一起考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号