首页> 外文期刊>BMC Emergency Medicine >Emergency department clinical leads’ experiences of implementing primary care services where GPs work in or alongside emergency departments in the UK: a qualitative study
【24h】

Emergency department clinical leads’ experiences of implementing primary care services where GPs work in or alongside emergency departments in the UK: a qualitative study

机译:急诊部门临床临床引导初级保健服务的经验,即英国的紧急部门或在急诊部门工作的初级保健服务:一个定性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

To manage increasing demand for emergency and unscheduled care NHS England policy has promoted services in which patients presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs) with non-urgent problems are directed to general practitioners (GPs) and other primary care clinicians working within or alongside emergency departments. However, the ways that hospitals have implemented primary care services in EDs are varied. The aim of this study was to describe ED clinical leads’ experiences of implementing and delivering ‘primary care services’ and ‘emergency medicine services’ where GPs were integrated into the ED team. We conducted interviews with ED clinical leads in England (n?=?19) and Wales (n?=?2). We used framework analysis to analyse interview transcripts and explore differences across ‘primary care services’, ‘emergency medicine services’ and emergency departments without primary care services. In EDs with separate primary care services, success was reported when having a distinct workforce of primary care clinicians, who improved waiting times and flow by seeing primary care-type patients in a timely way, using fewer investigations, and enabling ED doctors to focus on more acutely unwell patients. Some challenges were: trying to align their service with the policy guidance, inconsistent demand for primary care, accessible community primary care services, difficulties in recruiting GPs, lack of funding, difficulties in agreeing governance protocols and establishing effective streaming pathways. Where GPs were integrated into an ED workforce success was reported as managing the demand for both emergency and primary care and reducing admissions. Introducing a policy advocating a preferred model of service to address primary care demand was not useful for all emergency departments. To support successful and sustainable primary care services in or alongside EDs, policy makers and commissioners should consider varied ways that GPs can be employed to manage variation in local demand and also local contextual factors such as the ability to recruit and retain GPs, sustainable funding, clear governance frameworks, training, support and guidance for all staff. Whether or not streaming to a separate primary care service is useful also depended on the level of primary care demand.
机译:为了管理越来越多的紧急情况需求,不划分的护理NHS英国政策促进了向急诊部门(EDS)的患者提供了非紧急问题的患者,旨在向全科医生(GPS)和其他初级保健临床医生或在紧急部门工作。但是,医院在EDS中实施了初级保健服务的方式也是不同的。本研究的目的是描述ED临床主义的实施和提供“初级保健服务”和“紧急医学服务”的经验,其中GPS被整合到ED团队中。我们在英格兰的ED临床主因进行了采访(n?=?19)和威尔士(n?=?2)。我们使用框架分析来分析面试成绩单,探讨跨初级保健服务的“初级保健服务”,“紧急医学服务”和急诊部门的差异。在EDS中具有单独的初级保健服务,在具有初级保健临床医生的独特劳动力时,据报道了成功,他通过及时地看到初级保健型患者,使用较少的调查,并使ED医生专注于更敏锐的舒适患者。一些挑战是:试图将他们的服务与政策指导保持一致,对初级保健的不一致需求,可访问的社区初级保健服务,招聘GPS困难,缺乏资金,同意治理议定书的困难以及建立有效的流媒体途径。据报道,GPS融入了ED劳动力成功,以管理对紧急情况和初级保健和减少招生的需求。介绍一个倡导优选的服务模式,以解决初级保健需求对所有急诊部门没有有用。为了支持成功和可持续的初级保健服务,并遵循EDS,政策制定者和专员应考虑各种方式,即GPS可以用于管理当地需求的变化以及当地的环境因素,如招聘和保留GPS的能力,可持续资金,清除所有员工的治理框架,培训,支持和指导。无论是单独的初级护理服务流还是有用的,也取决于初级保健需求的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号