...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Ophthalmology >Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1?+?PRN regimen
【24h】

Comparison of the effects of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab and combination for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy under 1?+?PRN regimen

机译:光动力治疗,玻璃体内植物血管血管病变1°下的脊髓灰质脉络膜病变效应的比较

获取原文

摘要

The optimal treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is still under debate. Little knowledge is known about the treatment effect of "1+pro re nata(PRN)" treatment regimen for PCV. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT), intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) and combination therapy under the "1?+?PRN" treatment regimen for PCV. Fifty-seven eyes of 57 patients completed the 12?months' follow-up in this prospective study. The patients in the PDT arm(n?=?23), ranibizumab arm(n?=?18), or combination arm(n?=?16) underwent a session of PDT, IVR or combination of both at baseline followed by additional IVR as needed. Mean change of logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity (VA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and the regression rate of polyps were evaluated. Cost-benefit analysis was also performed. At Month 12, the mean logMAR VA improved from 0.90?±?0.52 to 0.75?±?0.57 in the PDT group (P??0.05), from 0.96?±?0.58 to 0.77?±?0.41 in the IVR group (P??0.05), and from 0.94?±?0.55 to 0.72?±?0.44 in the combination group (P??0.05), respectively. The CFT decreased from 478.04?±?156.70?μm, 527.5?±?195.90?μm, and 522.63?±?288.40?μm at the baseline to 366.43?±?148.28?μm, 373.17?±?134.88?μm and 328.44?±?103.25 in the PDT group (P??0.05), IVR group (P??0.01), and the combination group (P??0.05). PDT treatment (60.87%) was superior to the IVR therapy (22.22%) in achieving complete regression of polyps (P??0.05). Cost-benefit analysis showed that IVR treatment cost the least money for improving per 0.1logMAR units and the combination therapy demanded the least money for reducing per 100?μm of CFT. PDT, IVR and the combination therapy have similar efficacy in the VA improvement as well as the reduction of CFT under the "1?+?PRN" treatment regimen. Current Controlled Trials NCT03459144 . Registered retrospectively on March 2, 2018.
机译:息肉脉络膜血管病变(PCV)的最佳治疗仍在辩论下。关于PCV的“1 + PRO Nata(PRN)”治疗方案的治疗效果是众所周知的知识。本研究的目的是比较光动力治疗(PDT),玻璃体内Ranibizumab注射(IVR)和联合治疗的疗法在PCV的“1?+βPRN”治疗方案下的结果。 57名患者的57只患者完成了12个月的前瞻性研究中的12个月。 PDT臂中的患者(n?=Δ23),ranibizumab臂(n?=Δ18),或组合臂(n?=Δ16)接受了基线的PDT,IVR或两者的组合,然后额外地完成根据需要IVR。评估了分辨率最小角度(Logmar)视力(Va),中央污水厚度(CFT)和息肉的回归率的基调的平均变化。还进行了成本效益分析。在12月12日,平均Logmar Va从0.90°(p?<0.05)中提高0.90°±0.52至0.75?±0.57,从0.96?±0.58至0.77?±0.41( p?<?0.05),分别为0.94≤0.55至0.72?±0.44分别在组合组中(p?<β05)。 CFT从478.04θ±156.70?μm,527.5?±195.90?μm,522.63?±288.40?μm,在基线到366.43?±148.28?μm,373.17?±134.88?μm和328.44? ±103.25在PDT组(P?<β05),IVR组(P?<β01)和组合组(P ?? 0.05)。 PDT治疗(60.87%)优于IVR治疗(22.22%)在实现息肉的完全回归(P?<0.05)。成本效益分析表明,IVR治疗成本为每0.1坡单位改善的金额最少,组合治疗要求每100次μm的CFT减少最少的资金。 PDT,IVR和联合疗法在VA改善中具有相似的功效,以及“1?+ + PRN”治疗方案下的CFT的减少。目前对照试验NCT03459144。 2018年3月2日回顾性注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号