...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey
【24h】

Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey

机译:基于互联网的自杀预防研究中的道德问题与实用障碍:审查与调查员调查

获取原文
           

摘要

People who are at elevated risk of suicide stand to benefit from internet-based interventions; however, research in this area is likely impacted by a range of ethical and practical challenges. The aim of this study was to examine the ethical issues and practical barriers associated with clinical studies of internet-based interventions for suicide prevention. This was a mixed-methods study involving two phases. First, a systematic search was conducted to identify studies evaluating internet-based interventions for people at risk of suicide, and information pertaining to safety protocols and exclusion criteria was extracted. Second, investigators on the included studies were invited to complete an online survey comprising open-ended and forced-choice responses. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to analyse the data. The literature search identified 18 eligible studies, of which three excluded participants based on severity of suicide risk. Half of the 15 suicide researchers who participated in the survey had experienced problems obtaining ethics approval, and none had encountered adverse events attributed to their intervention. Survey respondents noted the difficulty of managing risk in online environments and the limitations associated with implementing safety protocols, although some also reported increased confidence resulting from the ethical review process. Respondents recommended researchers pursue a collaborative relationship with their research ethics committees. There is a balance to be achieved between the need to minimise the risk of adverse events whilst also ensuring interventions are being validated on populations who may be most likely to use and benefit from them (i.e., those who prefer anonymity). Further research is required to obtain the views of research ethics committees and research participants on these issues. Dialogue between researchers and ethics committees is necessary to address the need to ensure safety while also advancing the timely development of effective interventions in this critical area.
机译:在升高的自杀风险危险的人中受益于基于互联网的干预措施;然而,在这方面的研究可能会影响一系列道德和实际挑战。本研究的目的是研究与基于互联网的临床研究相关的道德问题和实际障碍,以便预防互联网的临床研究。这是一种涉及两阶段的混合方法研究。首先,进行了系统检索,以识别评估基于互联网的互联网干预措施的研究,以及提取与安全方案和排除标准有关的信息。其次,邀请研究人员在内的研究中完成了一个在线调查,包括开放式和强制选择反应。定量和定性方法用于分析数据。文献搜索确定了18项合格的研究,其中三项基于自杀风险严重程度的三名被排除的参与者。参加调查的15名自杀式研究人员的一半经历过伦理批准的问题,没有遇到归因于他们的干预的不良事件。调查受访者注意到在线环境中管理风险以及与实施安全方案相关的局限性,尽管有些人也报告了道德审查过程所产生的置信力增加。受访者推荐研究人员与他们的研究伦理委员会追求合作关系。在最大限度地减少不良事件的风险之间存在余额,同时还可以在可能最有可能使用和受益于它们的人口上验证了干预措施的情况下(即,那些喜欢匿名的人)。需要进一步的研究来获得研究伦理委员会和研究参与者对这些问题的看法。研究人员和伦理委员会之间的对话是解决确保安全的必要性,同时还推进了在这一关键领域的有效干预措施的及时发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号