首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures
【24h】

Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures

机译:牵引台与双反向牵引沉积物在治疗股骨轴骨折时

获取原文
           

摘要

A novel reduction technique of intramedullary nailing (IMN) for femoral shaft fractures was introduced, and in this study, its therapeutic effect was compared with patients treated with the traditional traction table. From November 2012 to August 2015, the patients with femoral shaft fractures fixed with anterograde IMN were reviewed. Seventy-four patients treated with the traction table and forty-eight patients treated with the double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) met the inclusion criteria of this study. The surgical time, blood loss, open reduction rate and complications were reviewed in this study. The fracture healing was assessed by the radiographs conducted at each follow-up. The functional outcome (hip and knee flexion, Harris Hip Score, and Lysholm knee score) was evaluated at the final follow-up. Average surgical time, blood loss, hip and knee flexion, and Harris Hip Score showed no difference (P??0.05) between the two groups. However, the DRTR was superior to the traction table in fracture healing, Lysholm knee score, open reduction and complications rate (P??0.05). Thus, we concluded that minimally invasive treatment of femoral shaft fractures could be obtained with the DRTR.
机译:引入了一种新型的股骨钉(IMN)对股骨轴骨折的新增技术,并在本研究中,将其治疗效果与用传统牵引表处理的患者进行比较。从2012年11月到2015年8月,综述了股骨轴骨折的患者,综述了Anterograde IMN。七十四名患者治疗牵引表和用双反向牵引批评者(DRTR)处理的48名患者符合本研究的纳入标准。本研究审查了手术时间,血液损失,开放率和并发症。通过在每次随访中进行的射线照片评估骨折愈合。在最终随访中评估了功能结果(髋关节和膝关节屈曲,哈里斯臀部评分和Lysholm膝关节分数)。平均手术时间,血液损失,髋关节和膝关节屈曲,以及两组之间没有差异(p?>Δ05)。然而,DRTR在骨折愈合中优于牵引表,Lysholm膝关节分数,开放减少和并发症率(P?<?0.05)。因此,我们得出结论,通过DRTR可以获得对股骨轴骨折的微创治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号