...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Weighing Scale-Based Pulse Transit Time is a Superior Marker of Blood Pressure than Conventional Pulse Arrival Time
【24h】

Weighing Scale-Based Pulse Transit Time is a Superior Marker of Blood Pressure than Conventional Pulse Arrival Time

机译:称量基于尺度的脉冲传输时间是血压的优越标记,而不是传统的脉冲到达时间

获取原文
           

摘要

Pulse transit time (PTT) is being widely pursued for cuff-less blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Most efforts have employed the time delay between ECG and finger photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms as a convenient surrogate of PTT. However, these conventional pulse arrival time (PAT) measurements include the pre-ejection period (PEP) and the time delay through small, muscular arteries and may thus be an unreliable marker of BP. We assessed a bathroom weighing scale-like system for convenient measurement of ballistocardiography and foot PPG waveforms - and thus PTT through larger, more elastic arteries - in terms of its ability to improve tracking of BP in individual subjects. We measured "scale PTT", conventional PAT, and cuff BP in humans during interventions that increased BP but changed PEP and smooth muscle contraction differently. Scale PTT tracked the diastolic BP changes well, with correlation coefficient of -0.80?±?0.02 (mean?±?SE) and root-mean-squared-error of 7.6?±?0.5?mmHg after a best-case calibration. Conventional PAT was significantly inferior in tracking these changes, with correlation coefficient of -0.60?±?0.04 and root-mean-squared-error of 14.6?±?1.5?mmHg (p??0.05). Scale PTT also tracked the systolic BP changes better than conventional PAT but not to an acceptable level. With further development, scale PTT may permit reliable, convenient measurement of BP.
机译:脉冲过渡时间(PTT)被广泛追求延长血压(BP)监测。大多数努力都采用了ECG和手指光学仪器描绘(PPG)波形之间的时间延迟作为PTT的方便替代。然而,这些传统的脉冲到达时间(PAT)测量包括预喷射时段(PEP)和通过小肌肉动脉的时间延迟,因此可以是BP的不可靠标记。我们评估了一种浴室称重秤样系统,可方便地测量芭蕾舞手术和足部PPG波形 - 因此PTT通过较大,更具弹性动脉 - 就其改善了个体受试者中BP跟踪的能力而言。在增加BP增加的干预过程中,我们在人类中测量了“缩放PTT”,常规PAT和袖口BP,但改变了PEP和平滑肌收缩。刻度PTT跟踪舒张压BP变化良好,相关系数为-0.80?±0.02(平均值?±se)和1.6?±0.5?mmhg的根平均分子误差为最佳校准后。在跟踪这些变化时,常规PAT显着劣等,具有-0.60的相关系数为-0.60?±0.04和根部平均平方误差为14.6?±1.5?mmHg(p?<0.05)。 SCALE PTT还跟踪了比传统PAT的收缩压变化更好,但不是可接受的水平。随着进一步的发展,SPACE PTT可以允许可靠,方便的BP测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号