首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Weighing Scale-Based Pulse Transit Time is a Superior Marker of Blood Pressure than Conventional Pulse Arrival Time
【2h】

Weighing Scale-Based Pulse Transit Time is a Superior Marker of Blood Pressure than Conventional Pulse Arrival Time

机译:基于秤的脉冲传输时间是血压的标记优于传统的脉冲到达时间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pulse transit time (PTT) is being widely pursued for cuff-less blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Most efforts have employed the time delay between ECG and finger photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms as a convenient surrogate of PTT. However, these conventional pulse arrival time (PAT) measurements include the pre-ejection period (PEP) and the time delay through small, muscular arteries and may thus be an unreliable marker of BP. We assessed a bathroom weighing scale-like system for convenient measurement of ballistocardiography and foot PPG waveforms – and thus PTT through larger, more elastic arteries – in terms of its ability to improve tracking of BP in individual subjects. We measured “scale PTT”, conventional PAT, and cuff BP in humans during interventions that increased BP but changed PEP and smooth muscle contraction differently. Scale PTT tracked the diastolic BP changes well, with correlation coefficient of −0.80 ± 0.02 (mean ± SE) and root-mean-squared-error of 7.6 ± 0.5 mmHg after a best-case calibration. Conventional PAT was significantly inferior in tracking these changes, with correlation coefficient of −0.60 ± 0.04 and root-mean-squared-error of 14.6 ± 1.5 mmHg (p < 0.05). Scale PTT also tracked the systolic BP changes better than conventional PAT but not to an acceptable level. With further development, scale PTT may permit reliable, convenient measurement of BP.
机译:脉搏传播时间(PTT)被广泛地用于无袖带血压(BP)监测。大多数努力已将ECG和手指光电容积描记(PPG)波形之间的时间延迟用作PTT的方便替代方法。但是,这些常规的脉冲到达时间(PAT)测量包括射血前期(PEP)和穿过细小肌肉动脉的时间延迟,因此可能是BP的不可靠标志。我们评估了一种类似于浴室秤的系统,以方便地测量心动描记图和足部PPG波形-从而通过更大,更具弹性的动脉测量PTT,从而提高了对单个受试者的BP追踪能力。我们在干预过程中测量了“标度PTT”,常规PAT和袖带BP,这些干预可增加BP但改变PEP和平滑肌收缩的程度不同。最佳情况下标定后,PTT量表追踪舒张压的变化良好,相关系数为−0.80±±0.02(平均值±±SE),均方根误差为7.6±±0.5±mmHg。常规PAT在跟踪这些变化方面明显较差,相关系数为-0.60±±0.04,均方根误差为14.6±1.5±mmHg(p <0.05)。 PTT量表还跟踪收缩压的变化优于常规PAT,但未达到可接受的水平。随着进一步的发展,PTT秤可以实现可靠,方便的BP测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号