首页> 外文期刊>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Comparison of the Efficacies of Disinfectants To Control Microbial Contamination in Dental Unit Water Systems in General Dental Practices across the European Union
【24h】

Comparison of the Efficacies of Disinfectants To Control Microbial Contamination in Dental Unit Water Systems in General Dental Practices across the European Union

机译:欧盟一般牙科实践中消毒剂对牙科单位水系统进行微生物污染的疗效比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Water delivered by dental unit water systems (DUWS) in general dental practices can harbor high numbers of bacteria, including opportunistic pathogens. Biofilms on tubing within DUWS provide a reservoir for microorganisms and should be controlled. This study compared disinfection products for their ability to meet the American Dental Association's guideline of ?1 for DUWS water. Alpron, BioBlue, Dentosept, Oxygenal, Sanosil, Sterilex Ultra, and Ster4Spray were tested in DUWS (n = 134) in Denmark, Germany, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Weekly water samples were tested for total viable counts (TVCs) on yeast extract agar, and, where possible, the effects of products on established biofilm (TVCs) were measured. A 4- to 5-week baseline measurement period was followed by 6 to 8 weeks of disinfection (intermittent or continuous product application). DUWS water TVCs before disinfection ranged from 0 to 5.41 log CFU · ml?1. Disinfectants achieved reductions in the median water TVC ranging from 0.69 (Ster4Spray) to 3.11 (Dentosept) log CFU · ml?1, although occasional high values (up to 4.88 log CFU · ml?1) occurred with all products. Before treatment, 64% of all baseline samples exceeded American Dental Association guidelines, compared to only 17% following commencement of treatment; where tested, biofilm TVCs were reduced to below detectable levels. The antimicrobial efficacies of products varied (e.g., 91% of water samples from DUWS treated with Dentosept or Oxygenal met American Dental Association guidelines, compared to 60% of those treated with Ster4Spray). Overall, the continuously applied products performed better than those applied intermittently. The most effective products were Dentosept and Oxygenal, although Dentosept gave the most consistent and sustained antimicrobial effect over time.
机译:一般牙科实践中牙科单位水系统(DUWS)提供的水可以含有大量细菌,包括机会主义病原体。 Duws内的管道上的生物膜为微生物提供了一种储存器,应控制。这项研究比较了消毒产品的能力,以满足美国牙科协会的指南,对于DUWS水。在丹麦,德国,希腊,爱尔兰,荷兰,西班牙和英国,在Duws(N = 134)中测试了山脉,生物柔性,牙膏,氧气,Sanosil,菌尿,Sert4spray,STER4SPRAY。每周进行一次水样用于酵母提取物琼脂上的总活计(TVCS),在可能的情况下,测量产品对已建立的生物膜(TVCS)的影响。 3至5周的基线测量期随后是6至8周的消毒(间歇或连续产品申请)。 DUWS水电TVCS在消毒前从0到5.41 LOG CFU·ML?1。消毒剂在0.69(ster4spray)到3.11(牙齿4mspray)到3.11(Dentosept)log cfu·ml·mlα1的中位水电TVC的减少,尽管偶尔的高值(最多4.88 log cfu·ml×1)也发生了所有产品。在治疗前,64 %的所有基线样本都超过了美国牙科协会指南,而治疗开始后仅为17 %;在测试的情况下,生物膜TVC被降低到低于可检测的水平。产品的抗微生物疗效变化(例如,用牙科患者或氧化牙齿达到美国牙科关联指南治疗的DUWs的91 %的水样,而用Ster4spray处理的60℃)。总体而言,连续应用的产品比间歇地应用的产品更好。最有效的产品是牙本质和氧化,尽管牙口糖会随着时间的推移给出了最一致和持续的抗微生物效果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号