...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Assessment of renal function by inulin clearance: comparison with creatinine clearance as determined by enzymatic methods.
【24h】

Assessment of renal function by inulin clearance: comparison with creatinine clearance as determined by enzymatic methods.

机译:菊粉清除评估肾功能:通过酶法测定的肌酐清除比较。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared creatinine clearances determined by enzymatic (Kodak Ektachem 700 single-slide, Boehringer Mannheim creatinine PAP) and nonenzymatic (Jaffé, HPLC) methods with glomerular filtration rate measured by inulin clearance in patients with varying degrees of renal function. The Kodak enzymatic assay gave values for creatinine 2 to 3 mg/L higher than the other methods. This resulted in significantly lower creatinine clearances than inulin clearances and creatinine clearances determined by the other methods. However, correlations between all methods for serum and urinary creatinine values and clearances were good. To avoid between assay (enzymatic vs nonenzymatic) discrepancies, manufacturers should agree to an acceptable standard of calibration under the usual conditions used with patients.
机译:我们比较了酶(柯达Ektachem 700单载,Boehringer Mannheim肌肉粉PAP)和非酶(jaffé,HPLC)方法确定的肌酐清除率,所述肾小球滤过术治疗肾功能不同inulin函数测量的肾小球过滤速率。柯达酶测定法为肌酸酐含量的值高于其他方法。这导致肌酐间隙明显低于菊粉间隙和由其他方法确定的肌酐清除。然而,所有血清和尿肌酐值和间隙的所有方法之间的相关性都很好。为了避免测定(酶VS非酶)差异,制造商应在患者使用的通常条件下同意可接受的校准标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号