...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >The neural correlates of two forms of bistability: a comparison of binocular and monocular rivalry with fMRI
【24h】

The neural correlates of two forms of bistability: a comparison of binocular and monocular rivalry with fMRI

机译:两种形式的双稳态神经相关性:与FMRI双目和单眼竞争的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The neural correlates of binocular rivalry are of considerable interest as they may shed light on mechanisms of conscious awareness. In a related phenomenon, monocular rivalry, a composite image is shown to both eyes. The subject experiences perceptual alternations in which the two stimulus components alternate in salience. The experience is similar to perceptual alternations in binocular rivalry, although the reduction in visibility of the suppressed component is greater for binocular rivalry, especially at higher stimulus contrasts (O'Shea et al., 2009). We used fMRI at 3T to image activity in visual cortex while subjects perceived either monocular or binocular rivalry. The stimulus patterns were left/right oblique gratings with luminance contrasts of 9%, 18% or 36%. Remarkably, both binocular and monocular rivalry showed a U-shaped function of activation as a function of contrast, i.e. higher activity for most areas at 9% and 36%. The increased activation at higher contrast can be explained by neuronal response gain reflected in faster alternation rates, while that at low contrast can be explained by disinhibition (Wilson, 2007). The cortical activation for monocular rivalry included occipital pole (V1, V2, V3), ventral temporal, and superior parietal cortex. The additional areas for binocular rivalry included area V3A, lateral occipital areas (including MT+), and inferior parietal cortex, including temporoparietal junction (TPJ). The activation in V2 and V3 was reduced for binocular compared to monocular rivalry at the higher contrasts that evoked stronger binocular perceptual suppression, indicating that the effects of suppression are not limited to interocular suppression in V1.
机译:双眼竞争的神经相关性具有相当大的兴趣,因为它们可能阐明了有意识的意识的机制。在相关现象中,单眼竞争,两个眼睛都显示了复合图像。该主题经历感知交替,其中两个刺激组分在显着性中交替。这种经验类似于双目竞争中的感知交替,尽管抑制组分的可见度降低更大,但双目竞争更大,特别是在更高的刺激对比度(O'shea等,2009)。我们使用FMRI在3T到Visual Cortex中的图像活动,而受试者感知单眼或双目竞争。刺激图案是左/右倾斜光栅,亮度对比度为9%,18%或36%。值得注意的是,双目和单眼竞争均显示出对比度的函数的U形函数,即大多数区域的较高活性为9%和36%。可以通过以更快的交替速率反映的神经元响应增益来解释更高对比度的增加,而在低对比度下可以解释(Wilson,2007)。单眼竞争的皮质活化包括枕骨(V1,V2,V3),腹侧颞延长和高级榫氏皮质。双目竞争的附加区域包括面积V3a,侧向枕骨区域(包括MT +)和下耳廓皮质,包括颞逐接线(TPJ)。与单眼竞争相比,v2和v3中的活化降低了双目的血管相比,诱发更强烈的双目感知抑制的较高的对比度,表明抑制的影响不限于V1中的间形抑制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号