首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Bistable Percepts in the Brain: fMRI Contrasts Monocular Pattern Rivalry and Binocular Rivalry
【2h】

Bistable Percepts in the Brain: fMRI Contrasts Monocular Pattern Rivalry and Binocular Rivalry

机译:大脑中的双稳态感知:fMRI对比单眼模式竞争和双眼竞争

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The neural correlates of binocular rivalry have been actively debated in recent years, and are of considerable interest as they may shed light on mechanisms of conscious awareness. In a related phenomenon, monocular rivalry, a composite image is shown to both eyes. The subject experiences perceptual alternations in which the two stimulus components alternate in clarity or salience. The experience is similar to perceptual alternations in binocular rivalry, although the reduction in visibility of the suppressed component is greater for binocular rivalry, especially at higher stimulus contrasts. We used fMRI at 3T to image activity in visual cortex while subjects perceived either monocular or binocular rivalry, or a matched non-rivalrous control condition. The stimulus patterns were left/right oblique gratings with the luminance contrast set at 9%, 18% or 36%. Compared to a blank screen, both binocular and monocular rivalry showed a U-shaped function of activation as a function of stimulus contrast, i.e. higher activity for most areas at 9% and 36%. The sites of cortical activation for monocular rivalry included occipital pole (V1, V2, V3), ventral temporal, and superior parietal cortex. The additional areas for binocular rivalry included lateral occipital regions, as well as inferior parietal cortex close to the temporoparietal junction (TPJ). In particular, higher-tier areas MT+ and V3A were more active for binocular than monocular rivalry for all contrasts. In comparison, activation in V2 and V3 was reduced for binocular compared to monocular rivalry at the higher contrasts that evoked stronger binocular perceptual suppression, indicating that the effects of suppression are not limited to interocular suppression in V1.
机译:近年来,关于双眼竞争的神经相关性已经进行了积极的辩论,并且由于它们可以揭示意识意识的机制,因此引起了极大的兴趣。在一种相关的现象(单眼竞争)中,两只眼睛都看到了合成图像。受试者经历知觉交替,其中两个刺激成分在清晰度或显着性上交替。经验类似于双眼竞争中的感知交替,尽管对于双眼竞争,尤其是在较高的刺激对比下,被抑制分量的可见性降低更大。我们在3T时使用功能磁共振成像来成像视觉皮层中的活动,而受试者则感觉到单眼或双眼的竞争或匹配的非竞争性控制条件。刺激图案是左/右斜光栅,亮度对比度设置为9%,18%或36%。与空白屏幕相比,双目和单眼竞争都显示出U型激活功能作为刺激对比的功能,即大多数区域的活动性分别为9%和36%。单眼竞争的皮质激活位点包括枕骨极(V1,V2,V3),颞腹侧和顶叶上皮层。双眼竞争的其他区域包括枕骨外侧区域以及靠近颞顶交界处(TPJ)的顶下皮质。尤其是,对于所有对比而言,更高级别的区域MT +和V3A的双目竞争比单眼竞争更为活跃。相比之下,与单眼竞争相比,双眼的V2和V3激活降低了,这引起了更强烈的双眼感知抑制作用,这表明抑制作用不仅限于V1的眼内抑制作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号