首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >A 2-year physical activity program for sedentary older adults does not improve cognitive functioning more than a health education program [synopsis]
【24h】

A 2-year physical activity program for sedentary older adults does not improve cognitive functioning more than a health education program [synopsis]

机译:久坐了老年人的2年体力活动计划并未提高认知功能,而不是健康教育计划[概要]

获取原文
       

摘要

Summary of: Sink KM, Espeland MA, Castro CM, Church T, Cohen R, Dodson JA, et al. Effect of a 24-month physical activity intervention vs health education on cognitive outcomes in sedentary older adults: the LIFE randomized trial. JAMA. 2015;314:781-790. Question: Does a physical activity program result in better cognitive function than a health education program in sedentary older adults living in the community? Design: Randomised, controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded assessment. Setting: Eight community centres in the United States of America. Participants: The study included sedentary men and women, aged 70 to 89 years, who were at risk of mobility disability but were able to walk 400 m. The key exclusion criterion was having a diagnosis of dementia or significant cognitive impairment based on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination score. Randomisation of 1635 parti- cipants allocated 818 to the physical activity group and 817 to the health education group. Interventions: The physical activity group participated in a 24-month program of twice-weekly, centre-based sessions of up to 30 minutes of moderate intensity walking, 10 minutes of lower limb resistance training, and 10 minutes of balance and flexibility exercises. In addition, the physical activity group were prescribed home exercises 3 to 4 times per week. The health education group attended weekly sessions for 26 weeks and monthly sessions thereafter. Sessions consisted of presentations, demonstrations or field trips. Outcome measures: The primary outcomes for this report were cognitive outcomes assessed at baseline and 24 months. Cognitive outcomes included the Digital Symbol Coding task (scored from 0 to 133 points) and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (scored from 0 to 12 words). Secondary1836-9553/ 2016 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by Elsevier B creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).outcome measures included executive function (measured with three tasks to assess speed of processing and executive function on a laptop computer), a composite global function score, and the incidence of mild cognitive impairment or dementia at 24 months. Results: A total of 1476 participants (90%) completed the study. Median attendance at physical activity sessions was 71%. At 24 months, there were no between-group differences for the Digital Symbol Coding Task (MD C0.01 points, 95% CI C0.80 to 0.77) or the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test for delayed word recall (MD C0.03 words, 95% CI C0.29 to 0.24) or immediate word recall (MD C0.14 words, 95% CI C0.58 to 0.29). There were no between-group differences for global and executive function measures, although sub-group analyses indicated benefits in executive function associated with physical activity for those aged at least 80 years and for those scoring<8 on the Short Physical Performance Battery. There was no difference in the incidence of mild cognitive impairment or dementia between the physical activity group (13.2%) and the health education group (12.1%) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.46). Conclusion: A 24-month physical activity program for older sedentary adults did not improve cognitive functioning compared with a health education program. Provenance: Invited. Not peer reviewed. Nicholas Taylor Associate Editor, Journal of Physiotherapy http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.12.008.
机译:摘要:水槽Km,Espeland Ma,Castro Cm,Church T,Cohen R,Dodson Ja,等。 24个月的身体活动干预对久坐老年人认知成果的影响:随机试验的生育教育。贾马。 2015; 314:781-790。问题:体育活动计划是否导致更好的认知功能,而不是居住在社区中的久坐老年人的健康教育计划?设计:随机,受控试验,隐藏分配和盲目评估。环境:美利坚合众国八个社区中心。参与者:该研究包括久坐不动的男性和女性,年龄在70至89岁,患有流动性残疾的风险,但能够走400米。关键排斥标准基于修改的迷你精神状态检查评分诊断痴呆或显着的认知障碍。 1635个伴侣的随机化分配了818份的身体活动集团,817年给健康教育集团。干预措施:体育活动集团参加了24个月的两次,中心的课程,最多30分钟的中等强度行走,10分钟的肢体电阻训练,以及10分钟的平衡和灵活性练习。此外,物理活动组规定的家庭练习每周3至4次。健康教育集团每周参加26周和每月会议。会议包括演示文稿,演示或实地考察。结果措施:本报告的主要结果是在基线和24个月内评估的认知结果。认知结果包括数字符号编码任务(从0到133分)和跳跃者口头学习测试(从0到12个单词评分)。 Secondary1836-9553 / 2016澳大利亚物理治疗协会。由elsevier b creatiocommommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).包括执行功能(用三项任务测量,以评估便携式计算机上的加工速度和执行功能),这是一个复合全局功能分数,和24个月在24个月的患者的发病率或痴呆。结果:共有1476名参与者(90%)完成了该研究。身体活动会议的中位数出席率为71%。在24个月之前,数字符号编码任务没有组差异(MD C0.01点,95%CI C0.80至0.77)或延迟单词召回的跳跃语言学习测试(MD C0.03字, 95%CI CO 29至0.24)或立即召回(MD CO.14字,95%CI C 0.58至0.29)。虽然小组分析了与较低80岁以上的人的实际活动相关的执行职能的福利,但对常规活动有关的福利,但均无差异。体育群(13.2%)和健康教育组(12.1%)(或1.08,95%CI 0.80至1.46)之间轻度认知障碍或痴呆症的发生率没有差异。结论:与健康教育方案相比,24个月的老年人久坐成年人的身体活动计划并未改善认知功能。来源:邀请。没有同行评论。尼古拉斯泰勒助理编辑,物理疗法学报http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.12.008。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号