...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >A bibliometric analysis of toxicology research productivity in Middle Eastern Arab countries during a 10-year period (2003–2012)
【24h】

A bibliometric analysis of toxicology research productivity in Middle Eastern Arab countries during a 10-year period (2003–2012)

机译:在10年期间,中东地区毒理学研究生产力的生物计量分析(2003-2012)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Bibliometric studies are increasingly being used for research assessment by involving the application of statistical methods to scientific publications to obtain the bibliographics for each country. The main objective of this study was to analyse the research productivity originating from 13 Middle Eastern Arab (MEA) countries with articles published in toxicology journals. Methods Data from January 1, 2003 till December 31, 2012 were searched for documents with specific words in the toxicology field as a “source title” in any one of the 13 MEA countries. Research productivity was evaluated based on a methodology developed and used in other bibliometric studies. Research productivity was adjusted to the national population and nominal gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Results Documents (n?=?1,240) were retrieved from 73 international peer-reviewed toxicology journals. The h-index of the retrieved documents was 39. Of the 73 journal titles, 52 (69.9%) have their IF listed in the ISI Journal Citation Reports 2012; 198 documents (16.0%) were published in journals that had no official IF. After adjusting for economy and population power, Egypt (193.6), Palestine (18.1), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) (13.0), and Jordan (11.5) had the highest research productivity. Countries with large economies, such as the Kuwait, United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Oman, tended to rank relatively low after adjustment of GDP. The total number of citations at the time of data analysis (August 4, 2013) was 10,991, with a median (interquartile range) of 4 (1–11). MEA collaborated more with countries in the MEA regions (16.7%), especially KSA, Egypt, and UAE, followed by Europe (14.4%), especially with the United Kingdom and Germany. Conclusions The present data show a promising rise and a good start for toxicology research activity in toxicology journals in the Arab world. Research output is low in some countries, which can be improved by investing in more international and national collaborative research projects in the field of toxicology.
机译:背景技术越来越多地用于研究评估,通过涉及将统计方法应用于科学出版物来获得每个国家的书目。本研究的主要目的是分析源自阿拉伯中东(MEA)国家的研究生产力,其中包含毒理学期刊的文章。方法从2003年1月1日到2012年12月31日的数据被检测到毒理学领域的特定单词作为一个13个MEA国家中任一项的“源标题”的文件。基于在其他伯格测定研究中开发和使用的方法评估研究生产率。研究生产力被调整为人均国家人口和名义国内生产总值(GDP)。结果从73名国际同行评审毒理学期刊中检索了文件(N?= 1,240)。未检索文件的H-索引为39.在73期期刊上,52名(69.9%)有其ISI期刊引文2012中列出; 198年文件(16.0%)发表在没有官方的期刊上。在调整经济和人口权力后,埃及(193.6),巴勒斯坦(18.1),沙特阿拉伯(KSA)(13.0)和约旦(11.5)的研究生产力最高。拥有大型经济体的国家,如科威特,阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)和阿曼,在调整GDP后往往相对较低。数据分析时间(2013年8月4日)的引用总数为10,991,中位数(四分位数)为4(1-11)。 MEA与MEA地区的国家(16.7%),特别是KSA,埃及和阿联酋的合作,其次是欧洲(14.4%),特别是与英国和德国。结论目前的数据表明,阿拉伯世界毒理学期刊中毒理学研究活动的有希望的崛起和良好的开始。一些国家的研究产出低,可以通过投资毒理学领域的更多国际和国家合作研究项目来改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号