首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Efficacy and safety of HD-MTX based systemic chemotherapy regimens: retrospective study of induction therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma in Chinese
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of HD-MTX based systemic chemotherapy regimens: retrospective study of induction therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma in Chinese

机译:基于HD-MTX的全身化疗方案的疗效和安全性:中国原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤诱导治疗的回顾性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

We performed a retrospective study of 49 patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), to compare the efficacy and safety of different high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based systemic chemotherapy regimens as induction therapy. 25 patients received AB?±?R alternative regimen (consist methotrexate, ifosfamide, vindesine, dexamethasone, carmustine and teniposide), while others received HD-MTX?±?R regimen. The complete response rate and overall response rate of AB?±?R group and HD-MTX?±?R group were 36.83% vs. 33.33%, and 68.42% vs. 71.43%, while the 2-year OS and PFS rate were 71.43% vs. 74.62%, and 42.86% vs. 54.64%, respectively. In Age??60 subgroup, the 2-year OS and PFS rate of AB?±?R group and HD-MTX?±?R group were 81.82% vs. 33.33%, and 54.55% vs. 33.33%. No significant differences were found in grade 3 or 4 toxicity rate. Generally, HD-MTX?±?R regimen was not inferior to AB?±?R alternative regimen, but AB?±?R alternative regimen seemed achieving more survival benefits in the elderly. We suggest to adjust HD-MTX?±?R regimen by changing the dose-reduction strategy especially in elderly patients and adding other powerful drugs that can well penetrate blood-brain barrier to improve the efficacy.
机译:我们对49位新诊断的原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)患者进行了回顾性研究,以比较不同的基于大剂量甲氨蝶呤(HD-MTX)的全身化疗方案作为诱导疗法的疗效和安全性。 25例患者接受了AB?±?R替代治疗(包括甲氨蝶呤,异环磷酰胺,长春地辛,地塞米松,卡莫司汀和替尼泊苷),而其他患者则接受了HD-MTX?±?R治疗。 AB≥±R组和HD-MTX≥±R组的完全缓解率和总体缓解率分别为36.83%,33.33%,68.42%和71.43%,而2年OS和PFS率分别为分别为71.43%和74.62%,以及42.86%和54.64%。在年龄≥60的亚组中,AB≥±R组和HD-MTX≥±R组的2年OS和PFS率分别为81.82%,33.33%,54.55%和33.33%。 3级或4级毒性率无明显差异。通常,HD-MTX?±?R方案不逊于AB?±?R替代方案,但AB?±?R替代方案似乎在老年人中获得了更多的生存益处。我们建议通过改变降低剂量的策略来调整HD-MTX?±?R方案,尤其是在老年患者中,并添加其他能很好地穿透血脑屏障的有效药物来提高疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号