...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Spatial summation across the central visual field: Implications for visual field testing
【24h】

Spatial summation across the central visual field: Implications for visual field testing

机译:中央视野的空间求和:视野测试的含义

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the present study, we measured the extent of spatial summation in the detection of image contrast within the central 40?° visual field. Contrast detection thresholds (in 28 observers) were measured for a spot of light of 10 different sizes [area: 0.03a??1.92(?°)2] at different retinal meridians (0?°, 45?°, 90?°, 135?°, 180?°, 225?°, 270?°, and 315?°) and eccentricities (0?°, 5?°, 10?°, 15?°, and 20?°). Contrast detection thresholds were significantly affected by the size of the stimulus with sensitivity improving with stimulus size consistent with Ricco's law. Summation curves were similar across different spatial meridians, but the extent of spatial summation increased with retinal eccentricity consistent with previous reports. The size of the stimulus was also shown to affect contrast detection thresholds in the periphery. In particular, contrast detection thresholds decreased more rapidly with increasing eccentricity for a smaller target than a larger one. This difference in performance is accounted for by the accompanying change in Ac with eccentricity. In Experiment 2, we show that spatial uncertainty affected contrast detection, particularly at eccentric locations greater than 5?°, such that cueing the location of the stimulus improved contrast thresholds. Spatial uncertainty improved overall performance but did not affect the estimates of the critical areas of summation. The results of the present study indicate that, due to spatial summation, detection performance is highly dependent on the size of the stimulus, its eccentric location, and spatial uncertainty. Future perimetric methodologies must consider these factors to improve detection sensitivity.
机译:在本研究中,我们测量了在40?°中央视野内检测图像对比度时空间求和的程度。在10个不同大小的光点(面积:0.03a ?? 1.92(?°)2)在不同的视网膜子午线(0?°,45?°,90?°, 135°,180°,225°,270°和315°)和偏心率(0°,5°,10°,15°和20°)。对比度的检测阈值受刺激大小的显着影响,灵敏度随刺激大小的增加而增加,符合里科定律。不同的空间子午线的求和曲线相似,但随着视网膜偏心率的增加,空间求和的程度与以前的报道一致。还显示了刺激的大小会影响周围的对比度检测阈值。特别是,对于较小的目标,与较大的目标相比,对比度检测阈值随偏心率的增加而迅速降低。性能上的这种差异是由Ac随偏心率的变化而引起的。在实验2中,我们表明空间不确定性会影响对比度检测,尤其是在大于5?°的偏心位置时,提示刺激位置会提高对比度阈值。空间不确定性改善了总体性能,但没有影响总和关键区域的估计。本研究的结果表明,由于空间求和,检测性能高度依赖于刺激的大小,其偏心位置和空间不确定性。未来的视野测量方法必须考虑这些因素以提高检测灵敏度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号