...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Ventral and dorsal streams in cortex: focal vs. ambient processing/exploitation vs. exploration
【24h】

Ventral and dorsal streams in cortex: focal vs. ambient processing/exploitation vs. exploration

机译:皮质中的腹侧和背侧流:聚焦与环境处理/开发与探索

获取原文

摘要

The idea of a dissociation of the visual pathway into two distinct streamsa??ventral and dorsala??that each processes distinct kinds of information is a powerful one. Two proposals along those lines state that the ventral stream processes information about object identity ("what"), whereas the dorsal stream processes information about either object location ("where"; Ungerleider & Mishkin, 1982;) or to perform motor acts ("how"; Goodale & Milner, 1992). Both proposals are influential but contradicted by recent data (e.g. ventral stream is involved in where/how computations; the dorsal stream is involved in "what" computations). We suggest a more robust dichotomy breaking down into 1. a ventral stream sampling high-resolution/focal spaces, and therefore, macularly-biased, and 2. dorsal ambient sampling, and therefore less spatially biased streams. This dichotomy may derive from pressures exerted during evolution by dense receptive surfaces. The idea further hews more closely to the theme of embodied cognition: Function arises as a consequence of an extant sensory underpinning. A continuous, rather than sharp, segregation based on function emerges, and carries with it an undercurrent of an exploitation-exploration dichotomy. Under this interpretation, cells of the dorsal stream, which individually have large receptive fields and poor spatial localization, do not provide information about location but rather of the presence/absence of salient objects in the visual field for exploration. Our model is not exclusive to the primate/hominid visual system but is extendable to the bat auditory system and could provide an evolutionary basis for the development of the fovea and mechanisms for eye tracking in animals. We leverage our dichotomy to explain neuropsychological cases (visual agnosia, optic ataxia), account for the prevalence of multisensory integration in the dorsal rather than the ventral stream under a Bayesian framework, and provide a dynamic component to the ventral-dorsal dichotomy that helps create a unified, seamless perception.
机译:将视觉通路分解为两个不同的流(腹侧和背侧流)的想法是,每条流都会处理不同种类的信息,这是一种有力的方法。沿着这些思路的两个建议指出,腹侧流处理有关对象身份的信息(“什么”),而背侧流处理有关对象位置的信息(“ where”; Ungerleider&Mishkin,1982;)或执行运动行为(“方式”; Goodale&Milner,1992年。两种提议都具有影响力,但与最新数据相矛盾(例如,腹侧流参与“何/何”计算;背侧流参与“什么”计算)。我们建议采用更可靠的二分法,分为以下两种:1.腹侧流对高分辨率/焦点空间进行采样,因此发生黄斑偏移;和2.背侧环境采样,因此对空间进行偏向的流较少。这种二分法可能源自密集的接受表面在进化过程中施加的压力。这个想法更接近于体现认知的主题:功能是现存的感觉基础的结果。出现了基于职能的连续而不是尖锐的隔离,并伴随着剥削与开发二分法的潮流。在这种解释下,背流的细胞,分别具有较大的接受区域和较差的空间定位,不提供有关位置的信息,而是提供视野中是否存在显着物体以供探索的信息。我们的模型不是灵长类动物/人类视觉系统所独有的,而是可以扩展到蝙蝠听觉系统的,并且可以为中央凹的发展和动物眼睛追踪的机制提供进化基础。我们利用二分法来解释神经心理学病例(视觉失明,视觉共济失调),解释在贝叶斯框架下在背侧而不是腹侧流中多感官整合的普遍性,并为腹背二分法提供动态成分,以帮助创建统一的无缝感知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号