...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >I Can't Afford Both: Walk-through-ability Affordance Judgments do not Correlate to the Distance on Hill Effect
【24h】

I Can't Afford Both: Walk-through-ability Affordance Judgments do not Correlate to the Distance on Hill Effect

机译:我不能负担得起:步行能力承受能力的判断与希尔效应上的距离不相关

获取原文

摘要

Previous research has shown that visual perception is fundamentally linked to information about the perceiver's body. The ecological approach to visual perception states that perception of affordances (i.e. environmental cues about action capabilities) is anchored to physical dimensions of the perceiver's body in a task relevant way, while the action-specific account for visual perception states that visual perception is linked to internal cues about action capability. For instance, the "distance on hill (DoH)" effect demonstrates that distance judgments are bioenergetically scaled, such that distances on hills are perceived as farther than equal distances on flat ground, due to the increased energy requirement to walk the distance on a hill versus on flat ground. Both theories posit that cues related to the perceiver's body and its potential for action modulate visual perception. However, this theoretical convergence is unexplored. We conducted an individual differences study by comparing participants' performance on a DoH task and an affordance task. For the DoH paradigm participants were presented a virtual hill on an Oculus Rift DK2. They then performed a visual matching task on the egocentric distance to both a cone on the hill and a cone on the flat ground. As expected, distances on hills were judged to be farther away than distances on flat ground, F(1,158)=85.25, p .001. For the affordance paradigm, participants made judgments on their ability to walk through a doorway aperture. Their affordance judgments were correlated with their actual abilities, r=.456, p .001. However, when we compared performance on these two tasks, there was no significant correlation between DoH effect and accuracy of affordance judgements, r=.014, p=.859. These data suggest that, although the action specific and ecological accounts for visual perception theoretically converge, they do not employ the same underlying mechanism.
机译:先前的研究表明,视觉感知与感知者的身体信息基本相关。视觉感知的生态学方法指出,对能力的感知(即关于行动能力的环境提示)以与任务相关的方式锚定于感知者身体的物理尺寸,而针对动作的特定于视觉感知的说明则表明视觉感知与关于行动能力的内部线索。例如,“在山上的距离(DoH)”效应表明,对距离的判断是生物量尺度的,因此,由于在山上行走该距离所需的能量增加,所以在山上的距离被认为比在平坦地面上的等距离还要远。而不是在平坦的地面上。两种理论都认为,与感知者身体及其动作潜力有关的线索会调节视觉感知。但是,这种理论上的融合尚待探索。我们通过比较参与者在DoH任务和负担能力任务上的表现进行了个体差异研究。对于DoH范例,参与者在Oculus Rift DK2上获得了虚拟山丘。然后,他们在以自我为中心的距离上执行视觉匹配任务,以匹配山上的圆锥体和平坦地面上的圆锥体。可以预期,山丘上的距离被认为比平坦地面上的距离更远,F(1,158)= 85.25,p <.001。对于负担模式,参与者对他们穿过门口孔的能力进行了判断。他们的负担能力判断与他们的实际能力相关,r = .456,p <.001。但是,当我们比较这两个任务的绩效时,DoH效果与负担能力判断的准确性之间没有显着相关性,r = .014,p = .859。这些数据表明,尽管特定于动作的行为和生态学对视觉感知的影响在理论上是一致的,但它们并没有采用相同的潜在机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号