首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Using detection or identification paradigms when assessing visual development: Is a shift in paradigm necessary?
【24h】

Using detection or identification paradigms when assessing visual development: Is a shift in paradigm necessary?

机译:在评估视觉发展时使用检测或识别范式:范式的转变是否必要?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AbstractAbstract: Abstract?? Given the inherent difference in judgment required to complete visual detection and identification tasks, it is unknown whether task selection differentially affects visual performance as a function of development. The aim of the present study is therefore to systematically assess and contrast visual performance using these two types of paradigms in order to determine whether paradigm-contingent differences in performance exist across different periods of development. To do so, we assessed sensitivity to both luminance- and texture-defined stationary and dynamic gratings using both detection and identification paradigms. Results demonstrated a relatively unchanged pattern of performance from the school ages through adolescence, suggesting that sensitivity was not differentially affected by choice of paradigm as a function of development. However, when averaged across age groups, a paradigm-contingent difference in sensitivity was evidenced for dynamic, texture-defined gratings only; it was easier to detect the spatial location of the gratings compared with identifying the direction of their motion. Paradigm-contingent differences were not evidenced for luminance-defined stimuli (whether stationary or dynamic), or for stationary, texture-defined gratings. In general, visual performance measured using either detection or identification paradigms is comparable across ages, particularly when information is stationary and defined by more simple visual attributes, such as luminance. Therefore, the use of detection paradigms might be advantageous under most circumstances when assessing visual abilities of very young and/or clinical populations in order to minimize potential challenges not related to visual perception (i.e., attentional) in these populations. Finally, paradigm-contingent differences in performance specific to dynamic, texture-defined information will be discussed.
机译:摘要摘要:摘要?鉴于完成视觉检测和识别任务所需的判断力存在内在差异,因此未知任务选择是否会视视觉功能而对开发产生不同的影响。因此,本研究的目的是使用这两种类型的范式系统地评估和对比视觉性能,以确定在不同的开发阶段是否存在范式或条件上的性能差异。为此,我们使用检测和识别范例评估了对亮度和纹理定义的固定和动态光栅的敏感性。结果表明,从学龄期到青春期的表现模式相对没有变化,这表明敏感性不受选择范式作为发展函数的影响。然而,当对各个年龄组进行平均时,仅动态的,由纹理定义的光栅就证明了灵敏度的范式或偶然差异。与识别光栅的运动方向相比,检测光栅的空间位置更容易。对于亮度定义的刺激(无论是静止的还是动态的)或静止的,纹理定义的光栅,均未证明范式或然差异。通常,使用检测或识别范式衡量的视觉效果在各个年龄段都是可比的,尤其是当信息是固定的并由更简单的视觉属性(例如亮度)定义时。因此,在评估非常年轻和/或临床人群的视觉能力时,在大多数情况下使用检测范例可能是有利的,以便最小化与这些人群的视觉感知(即注意力)无关的潜在挑战。最后,将讨论特定于动态纹理定义信息的性能的范式或偶然差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号