...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Updating visual working memory is both object-based and feature-selective
【24h】

Updating visual working memory is both object-based and feature-selective

机译:更新视觉工作记忆库既是基于对象的,也是基于特征的

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

How do we update visual working memory? When modifying our memory of an object to integrate new information with stored information, do we use an object-based process or a feature-based process? Previous work has suggested that updating is not object-based, but rather feature-selective, because people selectively update one feature of a memorized object without refreshing the memory of other features of the object (Ko & Seiffert, 2009 Mem Cognit). To test whether updating shows any object-based benefit, we asked participants to update two features of their visual working memory of either one object or two objects. Participants memorized a display composed of three colored, oriented bars in three different locations. The display was followed by a cue instructing participants to update their memory of one feature of the object at the same location as the cue. To manipulate whether one or two objects were updated, a second cue either appeared at the same or different bar location as the first cue. Also, the two cues were either the same feature or different features. After the cues, a single bar probe appeared at one of the three bar locations. Participants indicated whether the probe matched their memory. The facilitation effect of updating features did not spread to the other feature of the cued object or features of other objects, for both one object (interaction F(1,24)=21.9, p.001) and two-object (interaction F(1,24)=7.35, p.013) updating. This was consistent with previous results showing feature-selective mechanism in updating. However, when the updated object was probed, participants performed more accurately when updating one object than two objects (F(1,24)=29.7, p.001), showing evidence for an object-based mechanism. In addition, the feature-selective facilitation effect was significantly larger in one object updating than two-object updating (F(1,24)=6.30, p.02). Taken together, these results suggested that updating relies on both object-based and feature-selective mechanisms.
机译:我们如何更新视觉工作记忆?在修改对象的内存以将新信息与存储的信息集成在一起时,我们是使用基于对象的过程还是基于特征的过程?先前的工作表明更新不是基于对象的,而是基于功能的选择,因为人们可以选择更新已存储对象的一个​​功能,而无需刷新对象的其他功能(Ko&Seiffert,2009 Mem Cognit)。为了测试更新是否显示出任何基于对象的好处,我们要求参与者更新其一个对象或两个对象的视觉工作记忆的两个功能。参加者记住了在三个不同位置由三个彩色的,定向的条组成的显示。显示器后跟提示,指示参与者在与提示相同的位置更新他们对物体一个特征的记忆。为了控制一个或两个对象是否被更新,第二个提示出现在与第一个提示相同或不同的栏位置。同样,这两个线索是相同特征或不同特征。提示后,单个条形探头出现在三个条形位置之一。参与者指出探针是否与他们的记忆匹配。对于一个对象(交互作用F(1,24)= 21.9,p <.001)和两个对象(交互作用F),更新特征的促进效果并未扩展到提示对象的其他特征或其他对象的特征。 (1,24)= 7.35,p <.013)更新。这与以前的结果一致,后者显示了更新中的特征选择机制。但是,当探测到更新的对象时,参与者在更新一个对象时比两个对象执行得更准确(F(1,24)= 29.7,p <.001),这表明了基于对象的机制的证据。另外,一个对象更新中的特征选择促进效果明显大于两个对象更新(F(1,24)= 6.30,p <.02)。综上所述,这些结果表明更新既依赖于基于对象的机制又依赖于特征选择机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号