...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Convergent flash localization near saccades without equivalent “compression” of perceived separation
【24h】

Convergent flash localization near saccades without equivalent “compression” of perceived separation

机译:扫视点附近的收敛闪光局部化,而没有等效的“压缩”感知分离

获取原文

摘要

Visual space is sometimes said to be “compressed” before saccadic eye movements. The most central evidence for this hypothesis is a converging pattern of localization errors on single flashes presented close to saccade time under certain conditions. An intuitive version of the compression hypothesis predicts that the reported distance between simultaneous, spatially separated presaccadic flashes should contract in the same way as their individual locations. In our experiment we tested this prediction by having subjects perform one of two tasks on stimuli made up of two bars simultaneously flashed near saccade time: either localizing one of the bars or judging the separation between the two. Localization judgments showed the previously observed converging pattern over the 50–100 ms before saccades. Contractions in perceived separation between the two bars were not accurately predicted by this pattern: they occurred mainly during saccades and were much weaker than convergence in localization. Different forms of spatial information about flashed stimuli can be differentially modulated before, during, and after saccades. Structural alterations in the perceptual field around saccades may explain these different effects, but alternative hypotheses based on decision making under uncertainty and on the influence of other perisaccadic mechanisms are also consistent with this and other evidence.
机译:有时在进行眼球运动之前,视觉空间被“压缩”。该假设的最主要证据是在某些条件下接近扫视时间的单个闪光上的定位误差的收敛模式。压缩假设的直观版本预测,在空间上分离的同时进行的眼前闪光灯之间报告的距离应以与其各自位置相同的方式收缩。在我们的实验中,我们通过让受试者对由两个小节组成的刺激执行两项任务中的一项,同时在扫视时间附近闪烁,从而测试了这一预测:定位小节之一或判断两者之间的距离。本地化判断表明,先前观察到的在扫视前50-100 ms内的收敛模式。用这种模式不能准确地预测两根横条之间的感知收缩:它们主要发生在扫视过程中,并且比局部收敛弱得多。关于扫视刺激的不同形式的空间信息可以在扫视之前,之中和之后进行差分调制。扫视周围感知领域的结构变化可能解释了这些不同的影响,但是基于不确定性下的决策以及其他周周机制的影响的替代假设也与此证据和其他证据一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号