...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Are we overthinking it? Haptic perception of geographic slant is accurate when embedded within a secondary task
【24h】

Are we overthinking it? Haptic perception of geographic slant is accurate when embedded within a secondary task

机译:我们是否在考虑过度?嵌入到次要任务中时,对地理偏向的触觉感知是准确的

获取原文
           

摘要

Recent research (Hajnal, Wagman, Bunch, & Doyon, 2014) suggested that geographic slants feel steeper than they look. Visual perception of the stand-on-able-ness of an inclined surface is generally accurate and corresponds to an action boundary of approximately 30 degrees. Haptic perception underestimates the action boundary in laboratory settings. This may occur because more overt attention is dedicated to the perceptual task than is typical in performing everyday behaviors. Does focused attention lead to overthinking actions such as upright standing? When perceiving maximum reaching distance participants are more accurate when the judgment is embedded in another perception-action task (Heft, 1993). It was hypothesized that embedding haptic perception of stand-on-ability within another perception-action task would bring haptic judgments in line both with visual judgments and action capabilities. Specifically, haptic judgments were expected to be more accurate and judgments made near the transition point (30?°-36?°) would show longer response times and lower confidence ratings (Wagman & Hajnal, 2014). Observers placed a foot onto an occluded ramp while viewing a dangling light socket overhead and reported whether they would be able to screw a light bulb into the socket if they were allowed to stand on the ramp. Socket height was scaled to the observera??s maximal vertical reach and presented at that height as well as 5a?? above or below. Ramp presentations consisted of 7 angles ranging from 12?° to 48?° in 6?° increments. Perceptual boundaries were compared against actual action boundaries, i.e., the point at which the ramp no longer supports upright standing. Haptic perceptual boundaries (36.9?°) matched action boundaries (34.0?°). Confidence was lowest and response time was the longest at the angle nearest to the transition point (36?°). Results suggest that the affordance of stand-on-ability is best studied in the context of embedded everyday tasks.
机译:最近的研究(Hajnal,Wagman,Bunch和Doyon,2014年)表明,地理倾斜感觉比看起来更陡峭。倾斜表面的可站立性的视觉感知通常是准确的,并且对应于大约30度的作用边界。触觉感知低估了实验室环境中的动作边界。发生这种情况的原因是,与执行日常行为相比,对感知任务的公开关注更多。集中注意力会导致过度思考行为,例如直立站立吗?当感知到最大到达距离时,参与者的判断被嵌入到另一项感知-行动任务中时,参与者会更加准确(Heft,1993)。假设将对站立能力的触觉感知嵌入到另一个感知动作任务中将使触觉判断与视觉判断和动作能力都一致。具体而言,预计触觉判断会更准确,并且在过渡点(30°-36°)附近做出的判断将显示出更长的响应时间和更低的置信度(Wagman&Hajnal,2014)。观察者将一只脚放在被遮挡的坡道上,同时观察悬挂的悬挂式电灯插座,并报告了如果允许他们将灯泡固定在坡道上,是否能够将灯泡拧入插座。插座的高度按观察者的最大垂直距离缩放,并以该高度和5a的最大距离呈现。高于或低于。斜坡显示包括从12°至48°的7个角度,增量为6°。将感知边界与实际动作边界(即,坡道不再支持直立站立的点)进行比较。触觉感知边界(36.9°)与动作边界(34.0°)相匹配。在最接近过渡点的角度(36°)处,置信度最低,响应时间最长。结果表明,在嵌入式日常任务中最好研究站立能力的承受能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号