首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Signal detection theory cannot distinguish perceptual and response-based biases: Evidence from the Muller-Lyer illusion and application for action-specific effects
【24h】

Signal detection theory cannot distinguish perceptual and response-based biases: Evidence from the Muller-Lyer illusion and application for action-specific effects

机译:信号检测理论无法区分基于感知和基于响应的偏差:Muller-Lyer幻觉的证据以及针对特定动作效果的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

??According to the action-specific account of perception, perception is influenced by the perceivera??s ability to act. For example, softball players who are hitting better than others see the ball as bigger. These claims have been challenged on the grounds that the apparent effects in perception may be due to influences on the post-perceptual processes that generate the responses. Signal detection theory (SDT) seems poised to resolve this issue because it produces separate measures that are often linked to perceptual and decision-based processes. However, we will illustrate that SDT cannot distinguish perceptual biases from decision-based biases, and thus cannot be used to determine if action-specific effects are perceptual. Our illustration involves both an empirical demonstration and a graphical presentation of how a more advanced understanding of SDT would lead to the same conclusion. For the empirical demonstration, we used the Muller-Lyer illusion because it is analogous to the purported effects reported by the action-specific approach in that it leads to a perceptual bias. We found that the Muller-Lyer illusion did not influence da?? and rather influenced the criterion measure (c). In many contexts, this pattern of results would lead to the conclusion that the illusion is not perceptual. Instead, we claim that the illusion is perceptual but that SDT cannot distinguish between perceptual and response-based biases. We then dissect the measures of SDT and illustrate how the measure of c would reveal an influence of both a criterion shift (as in the case of a decision-based process) and a perceptual shift (as in the case of a perceptual bias). Therefore, even though action-specific effects influence c and not da?? (as shown in Experiment 2), this pattern of results cannot be interpreted as evidence that action-specific effects are not perceptual.
机译:根据感知的特定于动作的描述,感知受感知者行动能力的影响。例如,垒球运动员的击球能力比其他人更好,他们认为球更大。这些主张受到质疑的理由是,感知中的表观效果可能是由于对生成响应的感知后过程的影响所致。信号检测理论(SDT)似乎准备解决此问题,因为它会产生通常与感知和基于决策的过程相关的单独的度量。但是,我们将说明,SDT无法将感知偏差与基于决策的偏差区分开,因此不能用于确定特定于动作的效果是否为感知性的。我们的说明既涉及经验性演示,也涉及图形化的演示,说明如何对SDT进行更高级的理解将得出相同的结论。对于经验证明,我们使用了穆勒-里尔幻觉,因为它类似于特定于动作的方法所报告的所谓效果,因为它会导致感知偏差。我们发现Muller-Lyer幻觉不会影响da ??而是影响了标准措施(c)。在许多情况下,这种结果模式将得出结论:幻觉不是感知性的。相反,我们声称这种错觉是感知性的,但SDT无法区分感知性和基于响应的偏见。然后,我们将剖析SDT的度量,并说明c的度量将如何揭示标准移位(例如,基于决策的过程)和感知移位(例如,感知偏差)的影响。因此,即使特定于动作的影响影响c而不影响da ??? (如实验2中所示),这种结果模式不能解释为没有特定动作效果的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号