...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Monocular gain control explains dichoptic benefit in binocular global motion perception
【24h】

Monocular gain control explains dichoptic benefit in binocular global motion perception

机译:单眼增益控制解释了双眼全局运动感知中的双歧优势

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

When viewing random-dot kinematograms (RDKs), percent coherence thresholds for global motion perception are lower if signal and noise dots are presented to different eyes (Cai, Yuan, and Backus, VSS 2015). This dichoptic benefit might come about either from monocular gain control (MGC) -- more dots in the noise eye causing each noise dot to be less effective -- or from monocular bias in global motion integrators (MBGM). The roles of MGC and MBGM can be tested by comparing performance in two conditions: a "binocular" condition that has same number of signal and noise dots in each eye (no overlapping), and a "biased-binocular" condition that has same number of dots in each eye but signal all in one eye. If MBGM occurs, then putting all signal in one eye should be beneficial. But if MGC alone was responsible for the previously observed dichoptic benefit, then this benefit should disappear in both conditions. We therefore measured percent coherence thresholds in four conditions: "monocular" (all dots in one eye), "dichoptic" (signal in one eye, noise in the other), "biased-binocular", and "binocular". We tested 6 subjects with normal vision in a forced-choice net motion discrimination task with 100 dots using a stereoscope. Threshold was estimated using a 3-down-1-up staircase procedure. A brief display (300 ms) of two-frame dot motion at 30 Hz was used to minimize selective tracking. Trials from different conditions were intermixed. All subjects performed similarly in the "monocular" and "binocular" conditions but significantly better in the "dichoptic" condition, which replicated the previous finding. Performance in the "biased-binocular" condition was significantly worse than "dichoptic", although still better than "binocular" with marginal significance. We conclude that the dichoptic benefit during binocular RDKs motion tasks appears to be explained mostly by MGC. More evidence is required to definitively confirm or rule out MBGM.
机译:在查看随机点运动图(RDK)时,如果将信号点和噪声点呈现给不同的眼睛,则全局运动感知的相干阈值百分比会较低(Cai,Yuan和Backus,VSS 2015)。这种两极分化的好处可能来自单眼增益控制(MGC)-噪声眼中的点更多,导致每个噪声点的效率降低-或全局运动积分器(MBGM)中的单眼偏差。可以通过比较两种情况下的性能来测试MGC和MBGM的作用:“双眼”状态的每只眼睛具有相同数量的信号和噪声点(不重叠),以及“双眼”状态的相同数量。每只眼睛的点数,但一只眼睛全都发出信号。如果发生MBGM,那么将所有信号放在一只眼中应该是有益的。但是,如果仅由MGC负责先前观察到的两极分化益处,则该益处在两种情况下都应消失。因此,我们在四个条件下测量了相干阈值百分比:“单眼”(一只眼睛中的所有点),“散光”(一只眼中的信号,另一只眼中的噪声),“双眼”和“双眼”。我们使用立体镜在100个点的强制选择净动作识别任务中测试了6名具有正常视力的受试者。阈值是使用3下1上楼梯程序估算的。简短显示(30赫兹的两帧点运动的300 ms)用于最小化选择性跟踪。来自不同条件的试验混合在一起。所有受试者在“单眼”和“双眼”条件下的表现相似,但在“散光”条件下的表现明显更好,这重复了先前的发现。在“偏双目”状态下的性能明显差于“双目”,尽管在边缘意义上仍优于“双目”。我们得出的结论是,双眼RDK运动任务期间的两肢优势似乎主要是由MGC解释的。需要更多证据来明确确认或排除MBGM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号