首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Blink-induced masking and its effect on Multiple Object Tracking: It's easier to track those that stop during interrupted viewing
【24h】

Blink-induced masking and its effect on Multiple Object Tracking: It's easier to track those that stop during interrupted viewing

机译:眨眼感应蒙版及其对多对象跟踪的影响:更容易跟踪在中断查看过程中停止的蒙版

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

When tracking multiple objects, does the visual system encode the location and trajectory of tracked objects? Is encoding only triggered from the abrupt changes that typically occur in the real world such as when objects disappear behind other objects? We extend our 2009 work examining the role of location-coding in Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) using a novel blink-contingent method, enabling us to control simultaneously: item disappearance and abrupt transitions.1 Here, we introduce backward-masking to the eye-blink paradigm to further control onset transitions. Observers were instructed to blink their eyes when a brief tone was presented midway into each 5s trial of tracking (4 of 8 circles). Eye-blinks induced two events: item disappearance (for 150, 450, or 900 ms), and onset of a mask, which occluded the entire display of items (either for the full disappearance time, or 75ms plus a blackout for the remaining interrupt). During their disappearance, objects either continued moving along their trajectories, or halted until their reappearance. Therefore, a??movea?? objects reappeared further along their trajectory while a??halta?? objects did not. Results replicate Keane & Pylyshyn, (2006); and Aks et al., (2009) with better tracking when items halt [but here only reliably in the 450 and 900 ms trials]. These trends indicate that trajectory information is not encoded during tracking, and the visual system may refer back to past position samples as a a??best guessa?? for where tracked items are likely to reappear. Importantly, the a??halta?? advantage occurred in both blocked and randomized forms of object motion, suggestive of an automated and data-driven tracking mechanism; one not inclined to predict objects' trajectories even when presented in a repeated, and thus, predictable context. [1Although an eye-blink is a sudden event optically, we are typically unaware of it and it is likely not encoded as a transient event.]
机译:跟踪多个对象时,视觉系统是否对被跟踪对象的位置和轨迹进行编码?编码是否仅由现实世界中通常发生的突然变化触发,例如当对象消失在其他对象后面时?我们扩展了2009年的工作,使用一种新颖的眨眼或变态方法来研究位置编码在多对象跟踪(MOT)中的作用,使我们能够同时进行控制:项目消失和突然转变。1在这里,我们向眼睛介绍向后掩蔽-blink范例可进一步控制发作过渡。在每次5s跟踪试验的中间(大约8个圆圈中的4个)中途出现简短提示音时,指示观察者眨眨眼睛。眨眼引起了两个事件:项目消失(持续150、450或900 ms),以及遮罩的出现,遮挡了整个项目的显示(在整个消失时间内,或者在75ms加上剩余中断的停电时间) )。在它们消失的过程中,物体要么继续沿其轨迹移动,要么停下来直到它们再次出现。因此,一个“电影”?当“停顿”时,物体沿其轨迹再次出现。对象没有。结果与Keane&Pylyshyn(2006)相同;和Aks等人(2009)可以更好地跟踪项目停止的时间[但此处仅在450和900 ms的试验中可靠]。这些趋势表明,在跟踪过程中未对轨迹信息进行编码,视觉系统可能会参考过去的位置样本作为“最佳猜测”。跟踪的项目可能会重新出现的位置。重要的是,a ?? halta ??物体运动的受阻和随机形式均具有优势,这提示了自动和数据驱动的跟踪机制;即使在重复的,因此可预测的环境中呈现对象,也不会倾向于预测对象的轨迹。 [1尽管眨眼在视觉上是突发事件,但我们通常不知道它,因此它很可能不会被编码为瞬态事件。]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号