...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Can Clipless Division of Cystic Duct be Performed Safely Using Harmonic Scalpel?
【24h】

Can Clipless Division of Cystic Duct be Performed Safely Using Harmonic Scalpel?

机译:可以使用谐波解剖刀安全地进行囊状导管的无创分割吗?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The increasing frequency of cholecystectomy implies that there is a potential for increasing incidence of rare complications like migration of clips applied for occlusion of cystic duct into the common bile duct and causing biliary obstruction, many times several years after the initial surgery. Though use of Harmonic Scalpel (HS) alone for occlusion and division has been described, most surgeons are reluctant to use it.Aim: To assess the feasibility of cystic duct closure by using HS in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, done by comparing the burst pressures of excised gallbladders where cystic duct was closed using either conventional clip method or by HS.Materials and Methods: One hundred intact excised gallbladders from patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gall-stone disease were used for this study. Ex-vivo the cystic ducts of these gallbladders were randomly occluded by clip or HS (50 in each group). Then the gallbladder was immersed in isothermic saline and connected to a pressure transducer using 20-gauge cannula inserted through the body of the gallbladder. The gallbladder was slowly instilled with normal saline (1 mL/sec) until the gallbladder burst, while pressure recordings were continuously made. The burst pressure and site of burst was noted. The data on burst-pressure was subjected to Student?s t-test.Results: The overall mean burst pressure of extracted gallbladders was 164.12 mmHg, being 162.26±19.25 mmHg and 165.98±21.34 mmHg in the clip and HS group respectively (p-value=0.362). Analysis of subgroups based on sex, age, BMI, gallbladder wall thickness, cystic duct diameter, site of burst or eventual histopathological report also showed no significant difference between the burst pressures in the two groups. The minimum pressure at which burst occurred was 102 mmHg.Conclusion: HS provides equivalent safety (on comparison of burst pressure) for occlusion of cystic duct compared to metallic clip. Thus, HS alone can be used for cystic duct occlusion safely without any clip application.
机译:胆囊切除术的频率不断增加,这意味着可能会增加罕见并发症的发生率,例如在初次手术后的很多年中,将用于阻塞胆囊管的夹子迁移到胆总管并引起胆道梗阻。尽管已描述了仅使用谐波解剖刀(HS)进行咬合和分裂,但大多数外科医生都不愿使用它。目的:通过比较爆破片,评估在HS腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用HS闭合胆囊管的可行性。材料或方法:本研究使用了接受选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术的未切除胆结石患者的一百个完整的胆囊切开胆囊的压力。这些胆囊的胆囊管在体外被夹子或HS随机阻塞(每组50个)。然后将胆囊浸入等温盐水中,并使用穿过胆囊主体插入的20号套管将其连接至压力传感器。将胆囊缓慢注入生理盐水(1 mL / sec)直至胆囊破裂,同时连续进行压力记录。记录爆破压力和爆破部位。结果:提取的胆囊的总平均破裂压力为164.12 mmHg,夹子和HS组分别为162.26±19.25 mmHg和165.98±21.34 mmHg。 (p值= 0.362)。根据性别,年龄,BMI,胆囊壁厚度,胆囊管直径,破裂部位或最终组织病理学报告对亚组进行分析,结果显示两组的破裂压力之间无显着差异。发生爆裂的最小压力为102 mmHg。结论:与金属夹相比,HS可为囊性导管闭塞提供同等的安全性(与爆破压力比较)。因此,仅HS即可安全地用于胆囊管阻塞,而无需使用任何夹子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号