首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) for Better Learning in Pre-clinical Medical Education: A Controlled Trial
【24h】

Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) for Better Learning in Pre-clinical Medical Education: A Controlled Trial

机译:在临床前医学教育中更好学习的形成性评估课堂技术(FACT):对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) can serve as a useful and timely diagnostic and therapeutic mechanism for tiding over learning issues created during classroom instructions.Aim: Present study explored the efficacy of FACTs for better learning by diagnosing learning issues, timely instructional adjustments and feedback.Materials and Methods: Experimental study with first year professionals in faculty of Medicine (n=200) were assigned to experimental group (n=100) and control group (n=100) by non probability convenience sampling. Seven methods of FACTs viz., Classroom quiz, Exit ticket, One minute paper, Logic model for regulation of physiological mechanisms, One sentence summary, Directed paraphrasing and Muddiest point were undertaken for seven Physiology lectures. Based on FACTs responses, subsequent seven instructional activities were revised to close the learning gaps. Conventional instructional method was adopted for controls. A p-value, Absolute Learning Gain (ALG) and Effect Size for pre test and post test of both groups were calculated. Learner?s perception was recorded.Results: Unpaired t-test revealed significant differences (p<0.01). ALG was 68.5-75% in experimental and 51.8-57.1% in controls. Effect size (Cohen?s D) was 1.12.Conclusion: FACTs can serve as a useful and feasible mechanism for diagnosing learning issues, tailor instructional modifications and facilitate timely feedback to improve learning.
机译:形成性评估课堂技术(FACT)可以作为有用和及时的诊断和治疗机制,以解决课堂教学中产生的学习问题。目标:本研究通过诊断学习问题,及时教学,探索了FACT更好地学习的功效。调整和反馈。材料与方法:通过非概率便利抽样将在医学院任职的第一年专业人员的实验研究(n = 200)分为实验组(n = 100)和对照组(n = 100)。 FACTs的七种方法,即课堂测验,出场票,一分钟论文,调节生理机制的逻辑模型,一句话摘要,有针对性的释义和最糟点,共进行了七个生理学讲座。根据FACT的回应,随后的7项教学活动被修订以缩小学习差距。控制采用常规教学方法。计算两组的前测和后测的p值,绝对学习增益(ALG)和效应量。记录学习者的知觉。结果:未配对的t检验显示出显着差异(p <0.01)。实验中的ALG为68.5-75%,对照中的ALG为51.8-57.1%。影响大小(Cohen?s D)为1.12。结论:FACT可以作为诊断学习问题,调整教学内容并促进及时反馈以改善学习的有用且可行的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号