首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Closed Tray and Open Tray Impression Technique for Dental Implants using Two Different Impression Materials
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Closed Tray and Open Tray Impression Technique for Dental Implants using Two Different Impression Materials

机译:使用两种不同的印模材料对种植牙的封闭托盘和开放托盘印象技术的尺寸精度进行比较评估

获取原文
           

摘要

In the era of fixed prosthodontics where implant restorations are being routinely used, it is imperative for the dentist to correctly record the position and orientation of the implant. This necessitates the application of correct impression procedure, impression material and accurate die materials.Aim: This study aims at evaluating and comparing the effect of closed tray and open tray impression technique with polyvinyl siloxane and polyether as impression materials on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.Materials and Methods: This in vitro study is about implant definitive casts made using the open tray and closed tray impression technique using two different impression materials i.e., polyvinyl siloxane and polyether. The Co-ordinate measuring machine was used to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of the casts, then tested at the Tata Autocomponents-Interiors and Plastic Division (IPD), Pune. A total of 60 implant definitive casts were made. A total of 30 casts were made using each impression technique. These casts were further subgrouped wherein, 15 casts were made using polyvinyl siloxane as the impression material and 15 casts were made using polyether. The unpaired t-test was used for comparison.Results: Both the open tray and closed tray impression technique are comparable to each other and there is no statistically significant difference between the two. Also, the impression materials are equally good for impression making of implants (p>0.05).Conclusion: Either of the impression techniques and material used in the study can be used to make implant definitive casts.
机译:在定期使用固定修复体的固定修复学时代,牙科医生必须正确记录植入物的位置和方向。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较以聚乙烯基硅氧烷和聚醚为印模材料的密闭托盘和开放托盘压模技术对尺寸精度的影响。 材料和方法:这项体外研究是关于使用开放式托盘和封闭式托盘压印技术,使用两种不同的压印材料,即聚乙烯基硅氧烷和聚醚制作的植入物确定性铸模。使用坐标测量机评估铸件的尺寸精度,然后在Pune的Tata Autocomponents-Interiors and Plastic Division(IPD)进行测试。总共制作了60个植入物定型模型。使用每种压印技术总共制作了30个演员表。这些铸件被进一步分组,其中使用聚乙烯基硅氧烷作为压印材料制造了15个铸件,并且使用聚醚制造了15个铸件。结果使用未配对的t检验进行比较。结果:开放式托盘和封闭式托盘印模技术彼此可比,并且两者之间在统计学上没有显着差异。同样,印模材料同样适合植入物的印模制作(p> 0.05)。结论:研究中使用的任何印模技术和材料均可用于制作植入物定型铸件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号